• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 minutes ago

    It is fine to have casual knowledge of or a hunch about something, but far better to have the research and analysis to prove it.

  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    ITT: omg how other people don’t see what I, a very smart and superior person who browses technology communities, have known for years

    we should be celebrating that privacy issues are gaining more and more mainstream coverage.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No one cares about this stuff but techies/Lemmy. Regular people don’t care, like at all. They know tech companies do this stuff but if convenience>privacy, most people take the former every time to make life easier. Data privacy is not a tangeable thing in most people’s minds.

      There would have to be some sort of cataslismic event to wake people up enough for people to do anything meaningful. I don’t know what that would be, but I hope someone figures that out sooner rather than later.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 minutes ago

        I read this and ask “What is your intention with this post?” What is gained if everyone is this jaded?

      • sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        I don’t think this is true. Most people do care, in my anecdotal experience. I am not in tech circles. It is not a niche thing to be concerned about these days.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 minute ago

          Eh, most do care, they just don’t do anything about it. My siblings and brothers don’t like that companies like Google and Facebook harvest so much data, yet they continue using them.

          So whether people care isn’t a particularly interesting question, I’m more interested in what people are willing to do about it. Will they change what services they use? Would they change who they vote for (if a party actually prioritized privacy)? How much are they willing to pay to not have data harvested? And so on. Those are interesting questions.

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        44 minutes ago

        I don’t think some mass “waking up” event is going to occur, but every time another headline about it shows up, it gets more difficult to ignore or not care about it. and every time someone who’s on the fence about the issue will pay more attention to it, and perhaps use the offending platform less. baby steps.

        besides, I wouldn’t say people don’t care, they do when they get offered a choice: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/05/96-of-us-users-opt-out-of-app-tracking-in-ios-14-5-analytics-find/

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    We need you Lina Khan. We need you, but stronger, faster, better. Let’s fucking go.

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      People in this thread don’t seem to understand how anti big business the FTC has been since Lina Khan was appointed. These reports are meant to be used by congress to help guide real policy. It’s one thing to just assume social media is violating privacy, it’s another thing to have a facts-based report on exactly what is currently happening.

      Of course the FTC needs new laws to do any enforcement and there’s probably not enough anti corporation politicians to pass laws that give them real teeth on data privacy issues.

  • Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That’s literally the sales pitch to investors, and has been for decades.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    So this is why I switched to the fediverse. But to be honest, I have no idea if someone does things like that here or not. All my posts are public to everyone and machine readable. The only thing which would prevent someone of survailing users on the fediverse is it’s very small scale. It is probably just not worth the effort.

    • Mellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The new-ish Federal Trade Commission head has been making a push to work on quite a few projects for the past couple of years. They have a very small resources and man-power compared to the war chests of multibillion dollar companies, but recently, somehow managed to bring charges against Google as a monopoly. This in my opinion is a good thing. I consider myself a social liberal and a fiscal conservative. I don’t like how our government seems to take the money of these companies and turn a blind eye as they do what they want in pursuit of the almighty dollar. I support her endeavors working for the interests of the majority of people and not those few with the most money.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Have you considered that the answers you seek may be in the article?

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Getting as much done as they can before the election in case Trump wins, I think