Summary

Bernie Sanders criticizes the Democratic Party for neglecting the working class, leading to their recent election losses.

He highlights issues like economic inequality, job displacement, healthcare costs, and foreign policy as key concerns for the American people.

Sanders questions whether the Democratic leadership will address these issues or remain beholden to big money interests.

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    This is an inaccurate claim by Sanders. Biden was the first President to walk a picket line with striking workers.

    With union negotiations, he was pretty balanced. He did come down on the railroad strikes some after both sides got stuck, but they did get improvements beyond what management wanted to give. With the ports, though, he stuck with the workers and forced management to negotiate by refusing to override the strike.

    Could the Democrats do more? Sure. But they’re still recovering from the fever that took the party over with Clinton in '92. There are a lot of people who believe that win was a meaningful approval of the pro corporate but not racist Democratic Party platform, when in reality Clinton only won thanks to Perot.

    I don’t know that there was any magic messaging that Harris could’ve deployed this time around. I’m not sure there was any likely alternative even from a short post-Biden primary that could’ve done better than her.

    Trump has everyone thinking he has some magic way to boost salaries and lower prices. And he railed against the elites more stridently and apparently people believed him.

    On the other hand Google saw a lot of traffic with people asking if Biden dropped out so who knows what could have been done to avoid Trump 2.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    41 minutes ago

    Working class people can also suck, tho. Remember all those stickers they put on the gas pumps blaming biden for the price of gas. Like, common you fucking fools, that’s ridiculous and you would never let your bitch boy trump take the credit for that.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      Some of us never quit. It’s just annoying that everytime you bring up legit concerns its met with people defending the status quo. 2016 the status quo was drug to the town square and hung. I don’t care if you pulled it down marionette it around, it’s 2024 and a knife was stabbed through the heart of this country. Democrats still have the helm and they will do nothing, they will let it bleed out. All the power of the american government and they cannot weird it despite a lifetime working in it.

      If democrats were even going to consider change they would spend their political capital, NOW. Since it is all gone come January.

      Say I’m wrong and they can keep playing political footsy with NAZIs till the end of time, why, why, why, would anyone want that???

  • argarath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I wonder why Bernie and other progressives don’t band together and announce their own party. With enough big names (especially Bernie) they could gather enough attention to be a viable third party that actually represents progressive and more left leaning ideas than the democrats. They have two years until the next local elections to get their foot on the race, I think they could get done traction if they actually go for that

    • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      Bernie purposefully did not do that because he did not want to be seen as another Ralph Nader. He believed working inside the system would do more good than doing a dirty break. I also wish he went in the direction of a break from the democratic party, but that’s just not who he is.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        Sigh I was the same way but now I see that people just won’t get out out to keep evil men at bay. I had hoped we can stick with the dems until the GOP is not a threat and then make our break.

        If we made a progressive party now I wonder how many dire hard dems will join?

        • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          Unfortunately I would think very few would care. For example, the Green party is very progressive, and comes with a TON of advantages electorally. They’re on the ballot in almost every state, run in local and national elections, and have a system all set up for nominating people, etc. When you look at the Green party’s platform, it’s very close to what the progressives claim to actually want. Yet most democrats just shit on them at every opportunity instead of voting for the platform they ostensibly believe in.

    • chaonaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      There is a lot of “invisible” work that party orgs do. If you want to see why big names and attention alone don’t work, look at the Green Party. They have name recognition, ballot access and even get a bit of the vote each presidential election. What they’re missing is the “ground game” that gives the presence in nearly every race in every precinct, and the local engagement to actually win an appreciable chunk of elections every year (not just the presidential years).

    • UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bernie is not nearly as popular as most on the internet echo chambers would have you believe.

      The fact is this is now a money game. Grass roots campaings and parties are more disadvantaged than ever at being able to get their voice out to people, especially ones that arent perptually over connected to the internet and forums.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We already lost. The time is now to work on something new. Tuesday and the 60 days before it were shut up and vote. Today and the next 3.5 years are shout and organize.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The DNC needs to allow voters to elect who they actually want during the primary. We were force fed Hillary because the DNC didn’t want Bernie. We didn’t even have a primary because we were force fed Biden, then given Harris because Biden was so unelectable. The DNC must allow democratic process to take place so that voters elect the presidential candidate that they want.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 minutes ago

      The DNC is too old and too set in its ways. They’re like a bad police force- unreformable.

      The only way forward for the DNC is to visibly jettison their old guard and hope enough voters give them another shot- which is also a maybe at best. Losers lose.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Democratic party aside, Bernie couldn’t get the votes. I actually think the news media has been a much much bigger problem with someone like Bernie getting power. They always try to paint someone like him as being radical, when anywhere else in the world he would be a normal person on the left.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The issue with Bernie is that everyone knows he’s a socialist. If there was someone else who presented the same ideas Bernie has while also saying “I’m totally not like Bernie” people would actually vote for that candidate. Most Americans are closeted socialists, they’ll in favor of socialist policies as long as you don’t call it socialism.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        they’re too busy sanewashing totally normal ideas like seperating children from parents, tariffs on every import, and mass deportation. Totally rational positions squarely in the overton window.

        What will they say about the concentration camps those immigrants are rounded up into? What will they say about the military being deployed to round up residents? I guess we’ll find out.

        Taxing billionaires though, how radical

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      we don’t do that anymore, having “democratic” in party name is enough. be prepared to have liz cheney as nominee with ben shapiro as her running mate in 2028.

  • Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Hi. Working tradesman. I still voted blue even when the 4 years under trump were mostly better for me than under Biden. Of course most likely coasting off of Obama’s era. But I got no relief under Biden. I pay $20k a year for my Healthcare and still have to pay thousands a year out of pocket for visits. My family in Ukraine is still unsure what’s going to happen in the next year. Many of brothers in my local are unemployed now during the hardest time to pay to live. We hear the record profits the corporations made and swindled the working class dry so we can eat yet there has been no relief. How did making 6 figures for a family of 5 turn into almost living pay check to pay check.

    I’m ok with sacrifice if it means others get the help they need. But I don’t think anyone got the help they needed. We sacrificed for no benifit to anyone but the elite, and we are continuing to be ignored.

    This is what Sanders is talking about. And I’m afraid of what Trump is going to do for many Americans. For my Ukrainian family back home. For my neighbor who is Taiwanese. But recently I’m more worried to keep food on the table for my kids. I don’t even care who won anymore. I have election and political fatigue. I did what was asked. I keep doing what everyone thinks is right. But I’m burning out.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      This comment spoke to me. I’m in the trades as well. I vote blue because, its further left than I can get from the red party.

      Best of luck. We will need it.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      You’re likely eligible for your states Medicare subsidies. Democrats fixed the family glitch in 2022, so you’ll likely save thousands switching off your employer plan, even if you’re making low six figures.

      Of course those subsidies expire in 2025, and there is a snowballs chance in hell of those getting renewed now.

      Democrats did a lot of things to improve the lives of working class, at least as much as they could get pass the Republican house.

      Their problem is messaging. They are terrible at communicating what they’re doing, and how it’s going to help. I mean part of that problem is the media (ie fox news) is allowed to lie and Dems try to tell the truth. The playing field is not really level.

      • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        Another headache is that everything dems do is means tested, so you’ve got to jump through a bunch of hoops to figure out if you’re even eligible for any new program. Even if the programs do give relief to people, it’s much harder to message on a complicated program with layers of bureaucracy rather than “everyone gets 3k per child no matter what.”

  • m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If he formed a new party with young, fresh faces, I’d vote for them regardless of how that affected whatever the DNC did. I feel like there’s enough similar sentiment that he could force change in the DNC

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Finally. Everybody on Lemmy has been sucking donkey dick so hard. They’re not gonna save you. Need to start looking elsewhere or force their hand. RCV will help do that.

      • qevlarr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s the reality of first past the post. Third party voting is simply almost never an option. You’re mad at a natural law of the election system. Don’t hate the players, hate the game

        • argarath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If the third party is actually able to represent the people better than one of the current two why can’t it be switched to it? It could start with local elections to then state level candidates, it wouldn’t be a switch out of the blue, most people wouldn’t even know it exists the first few elections (hell, just the amount of people googling if Biden had dropped out of the race on the day of elections shows how uninformed people can be) but the current state of the democratic party can’t stay, it either gets kicked out or it adapts because of competition

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            Because of FPTP, that means that the GOP will have the presidency for a long time because the Democrats vote would be split.

            And if that is the case, you can be sure that no voting reform will happen, bringing back the two party system.

            It’s the natural evolution of FPTP system.

            The best case scenario would be for the Democratic party to prop up a political reform as one of their main issue, in the hope that the voters will give them the presidency, senate and house to do just that.

            But the DNC would have to follow through will all of that if they get to that point, which probably won’t happen.

            So yeah, it looks bleak no matter how you look at it.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          evidently, as this election proved, it’s not like voting on the lesser of two evils worked either. better to vote for a third party who actually stands on the side of the people.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          If I hate the game, and the players are the ones with the power to change the rules of the game and choose not to, where does that leave me?

          • qevlarr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            It leaves you stuck in the system you have along with those players. You can vote third party, organize around a different election system, but don’t shit on people who see that as wasted effort at best and sabotage at worst. They’re not wrong, because it’s an all-or-nothing play. You’re shooting the moon. If you vote third party, you’d better be 100% sure they’re gonna win or you’re just wasting your vote you could have used to cancel a fascist’s vote. Don’t say “they choose not to” but realize you’re demanding they take a huge risk with small chance of success (zero chance if you don’t organize and just complain on the internet)

    • tripopov@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      But the DNC has to shut down, because then it will just be a 50/25/25 split and that won’t work either.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I really don’t think that’s true anymore. Maybe looking at decades of political party data but I think the games kinda changed with MAGA taking repubs extreme and Dem’s going center-right. There are a lot of republicans who could find a home in the democratic party since we know 2028 will see a cult leader retiring and you know the Dem’s are gonna run an old white guy out of fear. I’m hoping another party can cause a splash that election cycle but I see it going blue and hopefully the infrastructure for this third-party progressive moment can become solid in local with sites on national.

        I’m no longer holding out for election change. Oregon just voted against RCV, the push-back from changing the voting system is just too much for our set-in-stone political machine we have running now. I’m definitely gonna look into the data about why that went down though, a lot of opposition from Dems and Repubs in Alaska and Maine so would be interesting to see what coalesced.

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          the Dem’s are gonna run an old white guy out of fear.

          Hey that’s not fair, maybe they’ll tap Hillary to turn this around /s (I hope)

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There either won’t be a 2028 election or it will be a sham. They have control of the entire government. The constitution will change. The courts will be harder right. The ONLY things holding them back will be a senator or two philibustering (until it’s outlawed) and the senses of high military command.

          Also since trump will have ultimate immunity in office he can simply ignore the constitution altogether without consequence. He won’t have to step down. As admitted he’ll be a dictator.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I don’t know what’s going to happen, but focusing on what you’re saying this early is only going to cause you panic when we need to be gathering our strength. We’ve seen from the MAGA movement that our democracy is fragile. The safeguards and protections that make everything "so difficult"tm to change these past decades aren’t necessarily that difficult after all.

            I can see a few well established Dem’s like Bernie and AOC jumping aboard a progressive party movement disguised as a blue wave much like was overtaken on the right. We see that there is room to capture voters that didn’t turn out and from both parties, a small band CAN take over a movement if their dedicated enough.

            It’s just unfortunate that it was someone on the right who first abandoned party-lined politics and showed you can tame a party while speaking to the base (again, it was only like 20% of the population). It really makes me think that Bernie should’ve handled the fiasco in Nevada and South Carolina differently during the 2016 primaries. No blame to him, and I’m not sure what lesson there is to be learned besides authoritarianism and narcissistic tendencies are a way to brute force yourself into politics. But, I would’ve loved to see Bernie politely take the gloves off and took it to the people to back him up as well like Trump did with his group (just not, you know, all murdery and dark).

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Oh yeah the way they did bernie dirty destroyed enthusiasm and that echos even today. The dems showed they don’t care for a populist movement.

              Im not saying give up. Just be real and listen to what trump and the right is saying. They don’t shroud their intent anymore. They say it up front. Dictator day one.

              We won’t see a restoring change come from a political party. Whether the goal is pushing the current political structures left or superceding them it must come from popular mobilization.

            • tripopov@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              What is strength gonna do if he literally does succeed in being a “dictator on day one” there is only one way to stop a fascist.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        50/25/25, huh? So that must account for Republican/Democrat/Left of Democrat -Where do you think the Libertarians stand in all of this? Do you think the Democrats lost this election because of third parties or was it because a significant chunk of former Democrat voters chose to stay home altogether? If former Democrat voters chose to stay home, then I ask you why?

        • tripopov@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well, it’s because democrats are dumb and didn’t show up. Either way it would have been closer than last time.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That statement calls for self reflection. Maybe it’s not the disenfranchised, refuse to go further right voters aren’t the “dumb” ones. Insanity is doing the same things over and over, expecting different results. Maybe it’s time to roll up our shirt sleeves and pant legs and get to work for something better. We deserve it and we’re worth it, maybe it’s time to develop serious worth and stand on it, ten down.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That could force a change in the DNC, but the change would be to push them further to the right. The issue is that the right-wing party won the election. They got more than 50% of the total votes. So the democrats aren’t going to see splitting their own base as a viable pathway to victory. If a left-wing faction splitters off, then the DNC will be forced to try to capture more votes on the other side instead.

      If the democrats won the election then we’d be in a situation where we can talk about pushing them further left. But when they lose, that’s not really an option. (Most of these strategy problems disappear with ranked choice voting… but I doubt the current government has any interest in pushing for that kind of change!)

      • OptimalHyena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I don’t think a lot of people offline think so much in red/blue and left/right. A working people’s party could peel voters from both parties, and bring in new voters. Starting right away I think a lot of wins could be made in the midterms at least locally if not nationally - maybe not with majorities but pluralities.

  • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Yesterday and today feel like I’m reliving my mom’s election loss back in 2016. I was too young then to understand the weight behind what was going on at the time, although I did at least understand why Trump seemed like a dumb candidate. Anyways, I distinctly remember how when it was obvious that Hillary lost, even though she won the popular vote, that something wasn’t right. My mom was sobbing while looking for places to move into, since we were moving out anyways. Now, 8 years later, I’m having those exact same feelings as she did except with my boyfriend on my side, knowing very well that come January that if nothing happens, we could very well be one of his first targeted groups. I fucking hate this timeline, man.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I was in college and living with a bisexual Saudi friend at the time. I’m a straight white man, so I wasn’t a target, but he absolutely was. I sat with him in the kitchen while we got drunk and he cried.

      The good news is he made it through fine and I think is doing well today still in the US. It’s going to suck, but most of us are probably going to survive this. Don’t give up all hope. Build your community, organize, join mutual aid groups, and build what we need to take back power in the future.

      They’re going to try to take us backward, but make them take us kicking and screaming. Don’t give up and let them have it for free.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    221
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    He’s 100% correct. This failure is a failure of the DNC to actually pay attention to what the voters want.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This election, like every failed election effort since 2000, was a referendum on the democratic party platform: neoliberal business as usual for the top 15% sprinkled with “we’re not Republicans”

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        “we’re not Republicans”

        Trust us, we are different. Oh how specifically are we different? What a great question, is it not the best part of this nation to be able to ask such things. Anyway, as I was saying…

  • ytsedude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    The only focused Democratic message for the past 8+ years has been, “We need to stop Trump,” which I agree with, but without Trump, I can’t think of a single, unified message. That’s not enough to get the general population fired up and excited to vote for Dems. One thing that made Obama so popular was he had specific goals and gave people hope.

    Trump, in the meantime, has been feeding people all sorts of promises and hopes and dreams. They’re all terrible and full of shit, but that is a more powerful message than just, “We need to stop Harris.”

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m also legitimately convinced that the average American person is just an asshole and likes other assholes. Trump is the most conceited, whiney, cry baby, know it all, jagoff and everybody knows it. He wears it like a medal. And people love it man. They just eat it up.

      It’s just like Carlin said. The politicians come from us. Because they are us.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Trump is the most conceited, whiney, cry baby, know it all, jagoff and everybody knows it. He wears it like a medal. And people love it man. They just eat it up.

        That’s the thing. I’m sick of the media painting this as a “they’re holding their noses and voting” thing. This dude doesn’t win despite his vulger rallies and his racist, sexist, homophobic, crazy, whiney, criminal, and arrogant behavior… He wins because of that shit.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t know, I try to be a little more optimistic. over 250million eligible voters, only 70million voted for Trump. That’s less than a 1/3 and could be lower if you included the entire population. People will spend extra time to pursue things that will benefit them directly, there just needs to be better communication about the good things that will benefit them for their time, not the things to be fearful of because people will tune that out (as shown by the voter turnout).

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      You know what does excite the dems though? And also the republicans?

      Actual progressive policies……

      As close as this election was, if Bernie betrayed the Democratic Party and ran as an independent in 2016, do you think he would have won

      I do

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Nah i dont think yall are willing to do it. 2028 you’ll be holding your nose again voting for an out of touch moderate to oppose trumps third term instead of giving a progressive you completely agree with any kind of chance.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Theres no primaries anymore. The wealthy party leaders decide the nominees.

          • ultranaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            You dont think Obama in 2008 was a real primary? His campaign fought hard for that nomination, it definitely wasn’t handed to them.

            • Heir_Of_Isildur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Yep, that was the last real one. Since then the establishment didn’t want to lose control of the process, so they setup the primaries.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Oh, haha-ah, you sweet summer child. Sure you will, after all but two candidates drop out of the race and give their hard-won delegates to the conservative candidate in exchange for cabinet positions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

        –I kid, with the condescension, because this is what happened before many of us got a chance to vote in the primaries in 2020 -A primary that Kamala Harris dropped out of because she was deeply unpopular.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Hrc was deeply unpopular. Biden was. Obama ran on personality and empty promises. He showed her was all too willing to sell himself when he first distanced himself from Rev. Weight, then moved his church membership. Phyrric victory, for him and everyone else.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    God fucking dammit he should have been the fucking president in 2016. Fuck this timeline.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Will the big money interests and well-paid consultants who control the Democratic Party learn any real lessons from this disastrous campaign? Will they understand the pain and political alienation that tens of millions of Americans are experiencing? Do they have any ideas as to how we can take on the increasingly powerful Oligarchy, which has so much economic power?” Sanders asked.

    ”Probably not”

    Bernie has been the Cassandra of the Democratic Party for decades. They need to realize that it has gone too far. The insane wealth gap, which has surpassed pre-Revolution France at this point, combined with the unaffordability of everything has created a crisis that won’t be fixed by platitudes and vague promises.

    People are desperate, afraid, and angry. Changing that to hope and enthusiasm requires real plans that average voters can understand and even more than that requires correctly showing people the source of the problem.

    Being beholden to billionaires is the real problem. And all their money, advertising, polling, and other bullshit didn’t do a damn thing to help Harris. Take them on the way FDR did or give the country to republicans permanently.

  • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Man, if he’d form a populist left party and stop caucusing with the Dems, he might get a lot of enthusiastic support and candidates running locally soon

      • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        We could also do this ourselves, if we could find a way to organize it.

        I’m sure with enough attention he’d acknowledge, and maybe support it.

        It may sound silly but what’s the alternative?

        • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I really think ranked choice voting is the answer here. It will open up the opportunity for third parties to actually gain traction.

          • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Me too but how are we going to get that changed before the next election?

            Before ranked choice voting we need at least one party to rally around with a candidate that focuses on popular issues. Once we have someone in office that will commit to those issues we can then talk about these kinds of changes.

            A good place to start would be at the state level since states run their own elections. For that all I can suggest is to get more actively involved in local politics than you ever have before.

            Of course, that’s assuming we have another election.

            • seaQueue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Never underestimate the obstruction from establishment Democrats at every level of government. We passed a bill authorizing statewide use of ranked preference voting in CA and our neoliberal democrat governor Gavin Newsom vetoed it. I generally support his policies but this one was a flat out “fuck you” to everyone alienated by the neoliberal business as usual party that runs our state.

              • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                16 hours ago

                The answer to obstruction at every level of government is to push back at every level of government then.

                That means getting involved in local government. You. Me. Us. All of us. Starting now.

            • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              17 hours ago

              That’s a good question. I think we need a massive push towards it, from our local officials all the way to the top. Bernie may get onboard.

              • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                True but nothings going to happen until we both demand it and actually do something about it.

                The time to be hopeful that one of the major parties has an awakening is over.

                • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Absolutely. I think that the best path of action is to let our local politicians know clearly that this is the desire of their constituents, and push hard to vote in candidates that support this. All of these politicians started somewhere, so the best hope for change starts locally and grows from there as word gets out.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A third party, eh? Nah, he needs to take over the Democratic Party once and for all.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He had momentum, the DNC, also run by our oligarchs denied him of the opportunity.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Not for long

          Bernie kicks ass like a kung fu fighter

          Dems lost this election Bernie is still kicking and just won his seat back easy peasy

          Dude is an old motherfucker but kind of in the same way Samuel L Jackson is a bad motherfucker

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          No there needs to be a place for “moderates” and embarrassed former-republicans to gather. The actual left can mobilize around Sanders and the current Republican party can die.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I hate to defend a major party, but it does feel like people expect Democrats to fix all the nation’s problems when they have utterly no power to do so.

    The reality is most Americans are not with Bernie on the things he’s talking about. The average American has been heavily propagandized by the corporate media (not just news media, all of it) to love corporate stuff. Capitalism good, socialism bad, cheap gas good, electric stoves bad. Go to most Americans in the rust belt, that’s how they think.

    If Democrats are supposed to skip to the part where they implement policies that no one currently supports outside of liberal intellectual circles with all the power they supposedly have, that’s skipping to the end. What’s Bernie’s solution for getting people outside of Vermont on his side to begin with?

    • splonglo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yougov US: Support for universal health care - 55.9 % vs 24.4% oppose

      Can’t find much data on the corporatism stuff, but don’t think that’s true either