• piccolo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The thing that bothers me is the revenue doesnt go to creators that I watch. Its all pooled and divided out by view count across the entire platform. Which is bs. I dont want my money going to the top channels that i have zero interest in. A better system is dividing it out to the channels I view.

    Thus why adblocking and patreon is highly popular…

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Again you’re wrong. It’s counted directly by the amount you watch and goes to the creators you watch.

      Or, equivalently, pool all revenue, divide by watch time, get the same result.

      You can verify this by constructing an excel table of 10 users (rows) and 3 channels (columns). Assign random % weights of “watch time” per user per channel. Assume a constant subscription fee of 1. Verify that a column_sum is the same as column_average*10, where 10 is the total platform revenue, as there are 10 users each paying 1.

      • mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You are assuming a fair distribution of watch time over channels and/or over the viewers. In reality, some channels are highly popular and some are not. A few proportion of people pay for yt premium. Assuming the payer’s money get distributed equally to creators, the less popular channels get less amount from those payers. The question is, does google distribute the paid money according to each user’s view?