The letter did not include any specific demands nor did it outline how the attorneys general believe the campaign could violate child protection laws.

  • PeterGintz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “However, Target management does have fiduciary duties to its shareholders to prudently manage the company and act loyally in the company’s best interests.”

    Not sure how reaching out to more groups to sell more products and generate more profit amongst those groups previously left out of the equation is not in the company’s best interest.

  • Col3814444@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Republicans complained when band-aid decided to make bandages for people with coloured skin instead of just assuming everyone was white.

    These people are hateful morons.

  • Madison_rogue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    …but the attorneys general did suggest that Target might find it “more profitable to sell the type of Pride that enshrines the love of the United States.”

    Less rainbows more 'Murica, Fuck yeah!

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re absolutely ignoring the fact that you can walk into any retailer and buy flag plastered merch all year round, but most of them only sell “Hey, maybe other people deserve to exist too?” stuff from June 1st to June 29th.