Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzM to Steam Deck@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoMicrosoft claims: Steam Deck Did Not Need Call Of Duty To Succeedgameranx.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down17 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1148arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft claims: Steam Deck Did Not Need Call Of Duty To Succeedgameranx.comFubarberry@sopuli.xyzM to Steam Deck@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square48fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaredlove67@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year ago The deck is only successful because Valve is already successful enough to take the first loss on a console This may be true(and I wouldn’t doubt it being the case, at least on the $399 model) but it’s pure speculation on your part.
minus-squaredlove67@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoI was only talking about your claim that they’re selling at a loss, nothing about success or not. We don’t know their BOM so its speculation that they’re taking a loss. (Unless I misunderstood your claim)
This may be true(and I wouldn’t doubt it being the case, at least on the $399 model) but it’s pure speculation on your part.
deleted by creator
I was only talking about your claim that they’re selling at a loss, nothing about success or not.
We don’t know their BOM so its speculation that they’re taking a loss. (Unless I misunderstood your claim)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator