• DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      Pointers are variables that don’t hold data themselves but instead hold a reference to it. It’s really common to redirect pointers to reference something other than what they originally referenced, which is the joke in this comic. He is changing the conversation so that Star Wars actually refers to Jaws.

      • Bronco1676@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Mhm yes that’s what I understood, but I didn’t understans whats funny about this? What does “I’m your father” mean if the movie is jaws?

        • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think the humor is meant to be in the juxtaposition between “reference” in media contexts (e.g. “I am your father”) and “reference” in programming contexts and applying the latter context to the former one.

          What does “I’m your father” mean if the movie is jaws?

          I think the absurdity of that question is part of said humor. That being said, I didn’t find it funny either.

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think it’s also the fact that people are sick of the “ummm achsfhrually they never said Luke I am your father, they said No, I am your father”

    • gianni@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      I personally don’t find it funny because these types of jokes essentially boil down to “I used a concept outside of its context, and for that reason alone it is funny”. However, with a lot of these jokes the context is so narrow (i.e. programming) that they are almost universally not understood by wider audiences.

      • Luvon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean programmers is a pretty big audience. Sure this probably would pan at a comedy open mike night but it’s literally on programmer humor.

        And using concept outside its normal concept or conflating two concepts is pretty standard humor.

        • gianni@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Conflating two concepts can be funny (e.g. puns) but this isn’t that. “Dereferencing a movie ” has no meaning outside of manual memory management.

          I understand humour is subjective but some jokes aren’t as strong as others (and some jokes aren’t jokes at all).

    • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      To reference a movie in common vocabulary is to bring it up in conversation.

      Referencing in programming terms like C refers to assigning a value to a variable. You can re-assign those variables to new values and then de-reference (read) the new value.

      They are conflating the common meaning of reference with the much more obscure programming definition (obscure at least among non-programmers).

      Star wars = “no, I am your father” (reference) Jaws = movie about hunting killer shark (reference) Star wars = movie about hunting killer shark (OP is pretending we can treat movie references like variable references and re-assigns the star wars variable to mean something else) “Hey, have you seen star wars? The movie about hunting a killer shark?” (De-referencing your newly re-assigned variable)

  • s12@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Let’s reassign “The Mario Movie” to reference some Mario fan content!

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, the first guy got a commonly-misquoted quote correct, so I assume he’ll next say “you’re going to need a bigger boat!”