The US has vetoed a Palestinian request to the United Nations security council for full UN membership, blocking the world body’s recognition of a Palestinian state.

The vote in the 15-member security council was 12 in favor, the US opposed and two abstentions, the UK and Switzerland.

US officials had been hoping Washington could avoid use of its veto if other states objected to a draft resolution before the council recommending the “State of Palestine be admitted to membership of the United Nations”.

  • Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Classic bs move.

    “No you can’t become a country through the UN. Talk to Israel.”

    Meanwhile, Israel: “haaaaaaahahahahahaha”

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    “We completely believe in the two-state solution and a state for the Palestinian people. We believe the best and the most sustainable way to do that is through direct negotiations between the parties,” the White House national security spokesperson, John Kirby, told reporters on board Air Force One on Thursday.

    I like how the US is holding this up so they can desperately try to convince Bibi of something he’s already refused to accept, after having spent 6 MONTHS failing to get them to stop killing children.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      We should invade Israel, set up a demilitarized zone between Gaza like North Korea.

      Not only would it help Palestinian civilians, it’s pretty much an auto election W for Biden. Get the left to appreciate actively stopping genocide and the right would have to begrudgingly accept Biden is big and powerful when Trump didn’t have the balls.

      Also get to see F-22s dogfight F-35s, win-win

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is such a sensible idea we can almost guarantee that it will not happen. Not even invade, just send a “security force” to prevent violence in both directions. Then he could even frame it as “protecting Israel” as well as protecting Gaza.

        Of course the problem is that Israel has already fucked up Gaza beyond recognition and rebuilding will take time and money

  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is why the UN is flawed and practically useless. The permanent members can just fuck everyone else around.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      On the contrary, this is the UN working as intended. Veto power is supposed to represent (at least originally) nuclear weapons capability. The idea is that we’d rather they just argue than bomb with nukes each other. There’s a ton of fuckery and appalling stuff around the UN. But overall, it has stopped far more violence than it has allowed to exist. It sucks as all hell for individuals and ethnic groups who suffer while the diplomats bicker. But the planet has not frozed on a nuclear winter yet, so thus far it has fulfilled it’s mission.

      • Sandbag@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Huh, never knew that. This new information really paints the UN in a different light for me now.

        Are there any primary sources you’d recommend for following up on this information?

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That justifies the existence of the UN, not the veto power for permanent members.

        Also your justification follows the “tiger repelent rock” pattern: we don’t really know if the “no nuclear winter yet” is due to the UN or not, much less due to the whole veto power thing - two conditions existing at the same time doesn’t mean they have a causal relationship.

        MAD is just as good or better explanation for that specific outcome and the process by which it would work it’s a lot simpler, so it’s the logical one to choose per Occan’s Razor.

      • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But for how long. People are losing trust in it and do not see it as an institution worth respecting. Its probably gonna end up like the League of Nations.

  • Fermion@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Did anyone else see someone dressed in a witches outfit in the center rather than a camera with a cloth cover?

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      States are defined by there monopoly on violence, or at least there claim to it. Nations are a group of people with some common identity. Palestine, like the kurds and the Jews before Israel are a nation without a state.

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        All the responsibility blood on your hands, and none of the power

        FTFY.

        Is the UN head chair a prestigious office inside the diplomatic corps? Obviously there’s cushy postings that are preferred over say, Syria - but is it a prized posting?

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Without veto power, the superpowers would have never agreed to the UN in the first place. Those who have power have never once given it up willingly, they just package it in different boxes.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s weird that Palestine didn’t automatically become a UN member due to the two state solution by the UN.