• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sanders successfully ran a similar playbook on executives from Merck and Johnson & Johnson earlier this year. Under the threat of subpoena, the company CEOs agreed to testify at a hearing on why companies charge more for medicines in the United States than abroad before the subpoena vote actually happened.

    This move is the latest maneuver in Sanders’ boldest pressure campaign yet to browbeat companies into lowering patients’ drug costs. Unlike other targets of Sanders’ ire that were drugs based on decades-old technology or developed in part with federal funding, Novo’s weight loss medicines in particular are innovative, effective, and wildly popular.

    This is what fighting for people looks like.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    5 months ago

    The this shit is under $90 usd in many nations. US is like $1000 to $1500, and many insurers won’t cover it.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t believe it’s actually $90 anywhere, that must be because of some sort of subsidy.
      In Denmark where Novo resides, the price is $200+ for the lowest dose. And Denmark allows parallel import if it can be bought cheaper elsewhere.

      USA has a very different market, with extreme penalties in case something goes wrong, that mandates higher self insurance, and sales channels that are almost built for abuse by almost everybody. I seriously doubt Novo makes 6 times more on Wegovy than they do elsewhere. The problem is in the American system.

      That said, I agree with Bernie Sanders that there’s a problem that needs to be fixed.

      EDIT: $200 is for 4 doses enough for 4 weeks.
      I bet the insane prices in USA, are mostly due to insurance companies and whole-sellers exploiting the lack of structure and regulation in the US system. Novo cannot take more that those are willing to pay, and if insurance chooses not to cover Wegovy, Novo sells nothing through that company. Insurance companies are in control more than anybody in USA.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        If the prices are as legitimate as you suggest then surely that will be easily revealed by the subpoena’d accounting books and Novo Nordisk will be cleared of suspicion. Wouldn’t that be the system working as intended?

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Oh yes, I’m not against Bernie doing this, but I wouldn’t call it the system working as intended, that it’s necessary.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    My ex takes a related medicine for diabetes. It supposedly isn’t useful for weight loss and it is a more reasonable price. However because it’s a related medicine, people are using it for weight loss anyway. Our pharmacy warned us they can’t predictably get more because there’s been a run on it.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If the pharmacy companies and insurers weren’t sleeping together then the insurers might be doing some kind of collective bargaining. But nope.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s very fair, Wegovy is more expensive in USA, because Americans are fatter.

    Edit:
    Sorry, my mistake. It’s of course because USA has the best healthcare system in the world.
    Except for the people who need it of course.

  • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m ok with it being expensive for non-diabetes cases because we do NOT want people using this for weight loss. There are already issues with intestinal linings weakening and other complications.

    Folks: there’s no shortcut to losing weight.

    Edit: overly simplified. It’s not just for diabetes but my larger point is legitimate medical cases. This of course includes some cases of obesity, and I’m glad it’s helped folks who need it.

    • zigmus64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You do realize that’s exactly what Wegovy is, right? Ozempic was being prescribed off-label for weight loss so much, it was severely impacting supply for diabetics who needed it to manage their diabetes. They put the drug through a second round of FDA testing to get approval as a weight loss drug.

      And, as someone taking Wegovy for weight loss… it’s no shortcut. It absolutely makes it easier to control your appetite but the side effects are non-trivial. I’ve struggled with my weight my entire life and I feel lucky I wasn’t heavier when I started, but before this I’ve been anywhere between 235 and 320 up and down for the last 15 years. This medication makes me feel, finally, like I’ve got a shot at losing the weight and getting it to a safe level.

      Now… if you’re talking about the people who want to take it for 2 months to lose some vanity weight before beach season… I absolutely agree.

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        How did you approach your doctor about it? I’m in the same boat.

        I’ve been thinking about getting it but I didn’t want to rush in case there are side affects they find out about.

        • scottywh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s very common for people who are obese to have prediabetic A1C levels show up in their blood work.

          There are absolutely side effects and they’re different for different people but some common short term ones are nausea, vomiting, gassiness, stomach discomfort, and fatigue.

          It’s still worth it for a lot of people.

        • bean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I asked mine kinda like “whats the deal with these new medications?” Explaining I knew only a bit about the difference between the two, higher dose weight-loss (wegovy) VS. meant for diabetics (ozempic).

          The poor soul in the waiting room behind me… Must have waited 30 minutes beyond the initial appointment because my doctor was so excited passionate about what these drugs can help with. He talked about a full hour about it.

          My takeaways (I’m not a doctor or with a perfect memory, so I might get this a little wrong):

          He somewhat likened our ‘automation systems’ in the brain to can’t being able to discern between ‘starvation mode’ and ‘plentiful bounty of food’ mode. So starving yourself for example to lose weight can still chemically cause your body to ‘hold’ weight for example; sensing that you’re at threat of death if it continues for an extended time. Likewise when food is abundant, it can still hold weight because it’s protecting you from future potential death by starvation. These changes are not something we can consciously control for good reason. Imagine you can stop your own heart with a thought.

          I’m sure there is much more to it, but this ‘automation system’ in the brain sticks out.

          Lastly, he said that if we wait a bit there will be competing drugs and ‘older version’ of these new drugs which become out of patent… And cheaper. So I’ll go talk to him in the autumn for a refresher and update.

          • krelvar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            To your last point, according to Hari, generics for semaglutide should be available in 2032.

            • bean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              For that drug yes. He did mention that there was something older, which these new ones are based on, which are coming out of patent. I believe it was liraglutide (victoza). Still seems to require daily injections I believe 😑 but for people who may need this, it’s maybe worth it. I used to take daily injections for allergies (slowly strengthened over time) and others get it for diabetes anyway. especially if it is cheaper and with generics.

              • krelvar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Ah yeah, I know what you’re referring to, and yes I think you’re right, it’s daily and I don’t think as effective but when your options are limited by insert rant about US “healthcare” here probably better than nothing.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I am specifically talking about the massive surge in people using it to shed vanity weight. I completely agree it has legitimate weight management uses and I’m glad it’s helped you.

        • zigmus64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Cool. It’s been helpful, but hot damn… if you don’t pay for it occasionally if you eat the wrong thing…

    • krelvar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You need to read Magic Pill by Johann Hari. There are pros and cons and he is very good at explaining both sides.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not sure why you’re being downvoted so much, it’s an interesting point. If you make it too cheap and it has a lot of side effects, you are t really saving anyone money. You’re not even improving their health in the long run.

      That being said, I have no idea how bad the long term effects are.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Except it does seem rather odd to keep a medicine from people whose lives it could save (obesity causes a lot more problems than diabetes), because someone somewhere might try to abuse it. Frankly, if you want to voluntarily abuse a drug, great. My interest is in relieving the suffering caused by obesity, not protecting people from the Darwin awards.

        Imagine saying that “insulin should be expensive because some people use it for suicide and it has side-effects.”

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I didn’t think it was an abuse of the medication, I thought the comment was just discussing side effects and potential complications from regular use of it

              • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                That’s not what I said. I’m saying we don’t want this being widely available and prescribed like tic tacs because people think it’ll make them look like a magazine cover. The side effects can be considerable. A doctor needs to be involved if you think you need ozempic, although sadly many are all too happy to rubber stamp it. Still, it’s being used as a shortcut by many and it’s not good for them.

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If a doctor prescribes it for real reasons I respect that but right now it’s a celebrity weight loss “hack”

          My friend has had 3 patients walk because she won’t prescribe ozempic to them. They are not obese or have some major medical consideration. They want to use it as a substitute for a diet that they don’t even really need.

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The whole prescription system is a rent-seeking scheme that enriches various middlemen, including your friend.

            How far have we fallen as a civilization that people have to meekly seek permission to take drugs? Bodily autonomy doesn’t extend to medicine, is that it? The unfathomable hypocrisy.

            • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t think it’s perfect but I can’t agree with people being able to walk around buying any medication at anytime without any oversight.

              • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                So are you a religious authoritarian or a garden variety fascist that you feel entitled to dictate to me what I can and cannot do with my body?

          • scottywh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            There are compounding pharmacies in every major city in the US who can provide generic versions of these medicines.

            They’re not going to be covered by insurance that way and they’re typically still not cheap exactly but they are cheaper than the brand names and available as an oral medication in addition to the self administered weekly shots.

            The only “shortage” has been of the proprietary injectors used by the major brand names.

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hey mods, the above comment was plenty “civil”.

        You’re turning this place into the same type of baby proof bull crap the other place became.