Let’s just get this out of the way, since it will be tweeted at me a million times: Wilhoit’s Law comes from a 2018 comment posted on the Crooked Timber blog. With devastating — and viral — precision, Frank Wilhoit wrote, “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

The searing truth of Wilhoit’s Law has been on full display this week in the disparate reaction Republican reactions to two alleged breaches of propriety: Sen. John Fetterman, D-Penn. wearing a hoodie to his office vs. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., getting to third base in the very public audience at “Beetlejuice: The Musical.” Well, the latter is not “alleged” at all, as Boebert getting handsy with her date before getting kicked out of the play was caught on a widely spread security tape. But, measured by volume in weight and decibel level, Republicans clearly believe that Fetterman being comfy while doing the people’s business is by far the greater offense against basic decency.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., loosened up the Senate’s dress code, saying, “Senators are able to choose what they wear on the Senate floor.” Republican levels of outrage quickly surpassed their anger at Donald Trump for unleashing a mob on the Capitol that broke the windows and smeared feces on the walls.

“Allowing casual clothing on the Senate floor disrespects the institution we serve,” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., wrote in a letter signed by 45 other Republican senators. Scott also called efforts to investigate the January 6 insurrection “political theater” and voted to overturn the 2020 election. On Fox News, the same network that repeatedly minimized January 6 a minor kerfuffle, the new dress code was described as “an abomination.” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, unwittingly insulted herself by threatening to wear a bikini.

This is all aimed directly at Fetterman, who is hated by Republicans for winning the 2022 swing state election, and who has taken on almost demonic proportions in the GOP imagination. This is doubly comical in light of their corresponding lack of outrage over Boebert vaping, acting like an ass, and groping her date’s crotch in an audience where children were present.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Tex. ranted at length on Twitter about “the lowest common denominator” and how “Senator John Fetterman is emblematic of the downfall of society.”

On the subject of his fellow Republican’s enjoyment of public sex acts, however, Crenshaw was notably silent.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., used Twitter to call Fetterman’s hoodies “disgraceful.” But even though she privately has no love for Boebert, she also has no interest in being seen disapproving publicly of Boebert’s behavior.

“Double standard” doesn’t adequately describe what’s going on here, since Fetterman’s sartorial choices harm no one, whereas disrupting a play with public sex acts is possibly criminal behavior. The word “hypocrisy” gets thrown around a lot by Republican critics. But that word fails to capture the situation, especially the lack of shame Republicans display when denouncing hoodies on Democrats while shrugging it off when members of their own party engage in public indecency, rape, and seditious conspiracy.

The hypocrite is someone who doesn’t live by their own values. But, as Wilhoit’s Law suggests, Republicans are living their own values when they back these ridiculous double standards. They really and truly believe rules are for other people, namely Democrats, and not for them.

Wilhoit’s Law is funny, but digging deeper suggests there’s an ideology and worldview that guides it that is far more disturbing than mere hypocrisy. It really comes down to a Republican belief that they are the only legitimate Americans and that Democrats are trespassers. The pretext may change — today it’s Fetterman’s hoodie while in the past it was “Clinton’s emails” or “Obama’s birth certificate” — but the underlying impulse remains the same. There are all different ways for Republicans to express the fundamental belief that Democrats are illegitimate.

Trump’s Big Lie was the most blatant manifestation of this GOP viewpoint. He never needed actual evidence of “voter fraud,” because to Trump and his followers, it was self-evident that any vote cast for a Democrat was inherently fraudulent. On January 6, Trump famously told the crowd, “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” That is the rhetoric of people who believe this country belongs to them alone, and who simply do not accept that people have a right to vote for anyone but a Republican.

This viewpoint is also seen in the recent enthusiasm Republicans display for impeaching public officials for the “high crime” of being Democrats. House Republicans can barely be bothered to erect a fake excuse for their upcoming impeachment of President Joe Biden, as it’s obvious that his only transgression is being a Democrat. Same story with efforts to impeach the recently elected Judge Janet Protasiewicz in Wisconsin or Judge Anita Earls of North Carolina. No one has actually accused either woman of a crime, or even of wearing a hoodie to work. It’s just that they are Democrats. We also see this in the ouster of elected officials from state houses in Tennessee and Montana. Feigned umbrage over “propriety” is a paper-thin cover for the real GOP motivation: a belief that no one Democrats vote for is legitimately elected.

The special loathing that Republicans have for Fetterman has nothing to do with his hoodies. It’s because he won in Pennsylvania. Republicans have a special anger over states where racially diverse urban centers help push Democratic candidates over the finish line in close elections because they don’t think those voters should have a voice in the first place. (This is also why you hear so much Republican vitriol over Chicago, because Illinois wouldn’t be a blue state without it.) For people who quietly think the only “real” voters in Pennsylvania live outside the cities, Fetterman’s continued presence in the Senate is a special irritation.

“Propriety” is an ambiguous and ever-shifting concept, which makes it perfect for Republicans looking for a pretext to deny the legitmacy of Democrats. They’re desperate to say that Fetterman doesn’t belong, and will grab onto any excuse, even something as dumb as an oversized hoodie. But, of course, the real reason Republicans don’t want Fetterman around is because they don’t think his voters had a right to choose him in the first place.

Fetterman has reacted to all the abuse with the casual wit that’s made him such a beloved figure in Pennsylvania politics. “I figure if I take up vaping and grabbing the hog during a live musical, they’ll make me a folk hero,” he tweeted on Tuesday. In response to Greene, he quipped, “she runs on more and more ding-a-ling pics,” a reference to how Greene tried to garner attention during a House hearing, by showing naked videos of Hunter Biden obtained off a shadily sourced laptop.

This flavor of Republican bullshit is funny, of course. But it’s also deeply dangerous. Their belief that they’re the only “real” Americans is what fueled the January 6 insurrection and is why most Republican voters are eager to vote for Trump again, despite his attempted coup. The hoodies vs. hand jobs debate only touches the surface of what is really a debate over who deserves to have a voice in American politics and who does not. As long as Republicans and their voters cling to their foul notions of what constitutes “legitimate” citizenship, they remain a dangerous threat to democracy.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Allowing casual clothing on the Senate floor disrespects the institution we serve” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., wrote in a letter signed by 45 other Republican senators.

    Okay, but what about being a fucking traitor?

    • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 year ago

      They hate that Fetterman looks and dresses like the people he serves. Working class laboring Americans.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I hate that we pay these goddamn worthless traitor parasites. We should treat them as the filth they are. I cannot wish enough ill upon republicans.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If we didn’t pay our legislators, the only people who would ever be able to run would be the wealthy and children of the wealthy.

          • eran_morad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re fucking traitors. Treat them as such. Pay the ones who aren’t attempting to install a goddamn dictator.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Allowing casual clothing on the Senate floor disrespects the institution we serve” Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla, American Traitor and Fraudster who stole over 1 billion dollars from medicaid, medicare, and other instutitions that help americas most at risk and needy.

  • Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s really damn simple. It’s because they don’t care.

    The hypocrisy is the point.

    Everything they do is “do as I say, not as I do”.

    It’s about control and power. Not about values.

    They have no actual values.

    • Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A pointing out the hypocrisy is moot, they will just move the goalpost further down field. Rules for thee, not for me.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s about control and power. Not about values.

      True. But it’s also about the social/class/wealth/gender hierarchies that they defend and believe deeply in. When you’re higher on the hierarchy than someone, that makes them your inferior and it subjects them to scrutiny and authority to which you are (insofar as the hierarchy is real) immune.

      So, when they howl for the little people to abide by rules that don’t apply to them they’re not overlooking that part, they’re flexing about ranking higher and being immune to that rule themselves. For people that believe in that, being flexed on in this way is a ‘put you in your place’ experience, it’s an exercise in dominating or shaming someone that has failed to know his place.

      It might be better to stop calling it hypocrisy, and to start calling it entitlement and arrogance.

    • cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one cares. Rightfully so. Only terminally online people are malding about either of these situations right now

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would think the “what about the children?!” party would care about a woman getting her breasts fondled and rubbing a man’s penis around a bunch of children.

        • cricket97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t see any kids around in the video. But yeah it’s a trashy thing to do but I’m not going to spend time caring about it. She’s an attention whore and it seems like people love giving her attention.

            • cricket97@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean I didn’t see any kids in the video, but sure I’m against sexual activity in public nonetheless. But I’m not going to pretend to care that much in this instance.

      • greavous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        An interesting take. It seems that plenty of people in congress care about at least one of them… Can you guess which?

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry, my public sexual indecency in the presence of minors, a felony, isn’t as shocking as a hoodie.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    How many trans people have been caught jerking off their partner while getting groped, vaping, and using inappropriate language in front of minors?

    Never mind - we’d better genocide the queers just in case - to protect the children, you see. Boebert? Whatever do you mean?

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was this political party in Germany in the 1930s that insisted everyone dress sharp while they tried to systematically wipe out anyone not blonde hair and blue eyed… the name escapes me though…

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is seriously the logical conclusion if things progress like this. Republicans are operating on complete bad faith, all in the pursuit of power and getting their way.

      And it’s all so obvious, and yet they still hold a lot of power in the US. That is seriously concerning. Or should be, at least.

      • kool_newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They learned how to turn the 1/3 of the population with the least critical thinking ability into their idiot army.

  • Sisko Urso@odin.lanofthedead.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not that they can’t see their own hypocrisy it’s that they don’t care. To their base they see only the one side anyways so it doesn’t matter to them. When will we stop pretending that the GOP is going to change from facing their own hypocrisy.

  • Currens_felis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think they care. They went after Obama’s tan suit, AOC’s dress and now Fetterman’s sweater.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Republicans are fully aware of the absurdity of their hypocrisy

    They just don’t care.

    And more over, they find absolute delight in people on the opposite side from them getting in a huff about it.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not even a case of ‘republicans believe themselvea the only real americans’ they act like they believe themselves the only real humans

    • 2Blave@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Therein lies the true danger from these zealous traitors: they see outgroups as not human and will happily commit any number of atrocities against anyone they consider “other.”

  • kool_newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The hypocrite is someone who doesn’t live by their own values. But, as Wilhoit’s Law suggests, Republicans are living their own values when they back these ridiculous double standards. They really and truly believe rules are for other people, namely Democrats, and not for them.

    Wilhoit’s Law is funny, but digging deeper suggests there’s an ideology and worldview that guides it that is far more disturbing than mere hypocrisy. It really comes down to a Republican belief that they are the only legitimate Americans and that Democrats are trespassers.

    Now combine this idea with the brain implants coming around and imagine the possibilities. What would an 1850 slave “owner” do to their slave if they could implant a chip to influence thought or cause pain? Right wing people have not “gotten better”, they are capable of now what they were then.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. It’s “not hypocrisy” when you’re consistent about believing rules are for your inferiors but not you, it’s a flex when you rub it in their faces that you are their superior.

      That’s the hidden context behind the left-right divide; the right think it’s obvious that there’s a social/class/wealth/race hierarchy while the left seem to expect equal treatment like we all learned about in civics. When they go after Fetterman for failing to ‘respect the decorum of the institution’, they’re not arguing based on rules that apply equally to everybody, they’re flexing when they invoke rules that don’t apply to them.

      The reason they love doing it so much is that ‘owning the libs’ reminds them that they’re superior while shaming or confounding them - even if it’s only so in their heads

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debating how hypocritical anybody in politics is being is a fool’s errand. It’s irrelevant and is not productive. Every single one of us exhibits forms of hypocrisy all the time.

    How about we shift to a paradigm where everyone criticizes politicians based on how good or bad their policies are, including how they vote on bills?

    • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are not idiots, and they do see the hypocrisy. They deliberately use it to persuade the “hearts and minds” of their voter base. They distract the common conservative with false indignation about hoodies, tan suits and buttery mails.

      Hanlon’s Razor applies here, but we mustn’t ignore the possibility of malice just because their actions seem stupid. With the undeniable history of conservative behavior we must clearly conclude that their intentions are malicious. Especially when the outcomes are so obviously malicious.

      If they were merely stupid, their “mistakes” would result in progressive actions equally. They are not plodding onward toward a dystopian nightmare, they are plotting the “utopian” future where they are the ruling elite and the “huddled masses” serve them mindlessly.