What’s the plan op? Do you really think you’re gonna diversify opinion or change minds by being this combative in a thread you started, and had to have known was a spicy topic to begin with?

There are meaningful discussions to be had on the general topic but I don’t think your approach was very effective

Interview fast. Leave without notice. (Drop your equipment off of course).

The company is actively harming you. You don’t have to be nice as you get away

The performer is the uncomfortable one.

Actually half of them buy the rumors that after the storms immigrants loot all the empty houses.

Bullshit of course

Wagon dat azzz

Where communist

Hell yeah brother

Holy shit

Apologizing after the fact can’t erase y response, unless you’d prefer I go back and edit.

My dude I don’t know shit other than consent is king. Does that admission appease you? The performers are uncomfortable and I care nothing about any real world limitations of the panel tour circuit. If they can’t do it right don’t do it at all. Volunteers or negative guest interactions are meaningless

Enjoy your win, you’re clearly so learned on the topic, leave me alone

As I said, you started with DK. How are you surprised I didn’t read further, and am unfriendly?

My point centered on consent, and someone sent me a dismissive opening on a long message. What’s to be done? Discard it.

Edit ZERO concerns are worth discussing if the consent of participants can’t be achieved.

Let’s be clear, opening with a dunning Kruger callout is rude. No one is an expert here, everyone is anonymous. It’s 100% unidan/jackdaw energy.

Further, I didn’t read your wall of text because nothing other than consent matters. If the performers are uncomfortable, I don’t care if they need the fuckin national guard to facilitate ID checks. I care nothing about the hurdles involved.

The whole schtick here is le redditor and I’ll stick with the simple “consent established, or leave”.

Lol what the fuck this is the most “well actually” I’ve ever seen.

Consent trumps all. If the performers are uncomfortable, it doesn’t matter how challenging the customer dynamic is.

If you hold an event, get the proper staff to keep your entertainers supported. Or don’t do it.

Concerts ID people all the time. The staff are available. Don’t act like this is some yet unheard-of Herculean task.

Agree in general. Ez fix: strings attached that it’s anonymous and unattached. A third party manages the exchange, and everyone is under oath. A step in the right direction at least

You really aren’t capable of actual discussion huh? Just loops and loops. You haven’t addressed the core point at all.

Edit when given the chance to discuss or clarify your position on an actual topic you just retreat to the same old lines.

Out of decorum, please note I made an edit which discuss the relationship between conservative judicial appointments and the core socialist base: the working class and the disenfranchised. I believe your comment came across while I was editing.

I’m not discussing voting strategy in this thread as you and I have discussed it before. I’m specifically discussing the content of your above comment, which you repeated, which indicates your comfortability with another trump term. I highlighted a consequence of that, which you have not addressed, and have continually tried to derail back to voting freedoms.

Edit Im not implying anything, I’m reviewing literal repeated language from you that suggests no care about at risk folks

Which means, if you’ve taken the conversation this far, that you aren’t for roe v Wade, and are pro conservative judicial activism from the bench.

Edit judicial conservatism is literally the tip of the spear of Christiofascist nationalism… One of the worst enemies of immigrants, at risk groups, and the working class in general.

Pretty incongruous with being a socialist.

I don’t know why you keep bringing up voting. I’m not discussing that

Covered in ectoplasmic goo

Bach? Beethoven? Breeches? Shiiieeet you’d get shot for wearing those where I’m from

You said you’re ok with another trump term and I highlighted a concrete consequence of that. This isn’t about voting, it’s about what you’re ok with.

Edit based on your own words, you are at least neutral, if not accepting of the type of policy and appointments trump makes. That’s the mask off. You said you aren’t afraid, suggesting you are positioned to not be materially impacted by trump, which is the privilege component.

I’ve made no comment on anything beyond what you’ve posted, and have not suggested you don’t deserve to vote for whoever you like. Im discussing the content of your comment.