• Handles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    a custom distro

    …or just a pre-exsting one. Heck, they should just make it a point to support open source development.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      This. Just require all gov products and documentation to be open. (unless military and even then open were possible)

      Creating a new distro is not needed. Let users or nation gov bodies select or create as they see fit.

      • loics2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Just require all gov products and documentation to be open. (unless military and even then open were possible)

        This is the case for Switzerland, a new law was implemented a few months ago

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Supporting existing ones where possible and adding private stuff or diatro specific stuff when it’s not is the best way to go. Like valve and arch.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And it’s not like every major distro doesn’t have a way to add custom repos to the stock package manager if they need to deviate from the disro’s stock repos for any reason