Corroded to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agoWhen printer ink is more expensive than buying a new printerimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1202arrow-down10
arrow-up1202arrow-down1imageWhen printer ink is more expensive than buying a new printerCorroded to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squaremipadaitu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·5 months agoIt really depends on your needs though. Yes, if you are printing documents, then laser is the only way to go. But if you are printing pictures, then inkjet is by far the better choice. Though in most people’s situation, they could probably just use laser for 98% of their needs, and then go to Walgreens for picture printing.
minus-squareProgrammingSocks@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoIt’s often more economical to get pictures printed from a professional place anyways. Most people don’t have a use case where being able to print bulk pictures makes sense. Usually it’s a “just in case” feature that people use twice a year.
It really depends on your needs though. Yes, if you are printing documents, then laser is the only way to go.
But if you are printing pictures, then inkjet is by far the better choice.
Though in most people’s situation, they could probably just use laser for 98% of their needs, and then go to Walgreens for picture printing.
It’s often more economical to get pictures printed from a professional place anyways. Most people don’t have a use case where being able to print bulk pictures makes sense. Usually it’s a “just in case” feature that people use twice a year.