• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Than she can largely ceremoniously get fucked. I don’t care why anyone deigns themselves a monarch.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They never felt the need to have a monarch. Now they only symbolically have one, and the aim of that was to prevent the loss of their culture.

      It’s not an actual ruling position, so your anti-monarchy sentiment really doesn’t apply here.

      What you should be mad at is that their culture was put under such a threat that they saw the need to emulate even the tiniest bit of monarchies.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Māori_King_movement

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Really, what you can infer from their statement is that the British gave the Maori a gift by bringing them democracy.

        Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t see any sign of such inference. He only said that Maori felt the need to create a symbolic figurehead to counter the threat that British colonialism did put on their culture.

          I don’t know much on that topic, but I can confidently say that your answer is really far fetched.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think you misunderstand the conversation chain here. The person I was responding to and I are in agreement about the original poster. I was just saying that you can infer a pro-colonialist sentiment from their ‘fuck their monarchy’ attitude.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Is he?

            The movement arose among a group of central North Island iwi in the 1850s as a means of attaining Māori unity to halt the alienation of land at a time of rapid population growth by European colonists. The movement sought to establish a monarch who could claim status similar to that of Queen Victoria and thus provide a way for Māori to deal with Pākehā (Europeans) on equal footing. It took on the appearance of an alternative government with its own flag, newspaper, bank, councillors, magistrates and law enforcement. But it was viewed by the colonial government as a challenge to the supremacy of the British monarchy, leading in turn to the 1863 invasion of Waikato, which was partly motivated by a drive to neutralise the Kīngitanga’s power and influence. Following their defeat at Ōrākau in 1864, Kīngitanga forces withdrew into the Ngāti Maniapoto tribal region of the North Island that became known as the King Country.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m really not. The monarchy was a response to British colonialism. You are saying it was a bad thing because monarchies are bad. Therefore the British colonialism that the bad thing was fighting and got rid of the bad thing and replaced it with democracy must be the better alternative.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m really not. The monarchy was a response to British colonialism. You are saying it was a bad thing because monarchies are bad. Therefore the British colonialism that the bad thing was fighting and got rid of the bad thing and replaced it with democracy must be the better alternative.

              I cannot parse this.