• ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why do you ask this as if it’s not a thing?

    Look up Santiago Bernabéu or Camp Nou, two of the largest stadiums in Europe, and you find no over ground parking lots. Same applies to most stadiums, with many actually being very well articulated with mass transit, to the point that it’s much quicker to just take the subway/train/bus on match day than to be stuck in traffic for hours.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sorry, for the pedants out there, ‘why don’t all stadiums have parking garage systems instead of flat parking lots?’

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If land is cheaper than construction costs, then they build a parking lot. If construction costs are cheaper than land, they build a parkade

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you factoring in the opportunity cost of the wasted (poor optimized) space? Of all the extra fuel people have to burn to get around said wasted space? What about the long term environmental impacts? What is the value of a person’s life (time) and what value do we put on the time that is taken from us because of wasteful sprawl?

          Wasting land is only cheaper because the real costs get put on the rest of society and future generations.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It doesn’t matter if I am; they aren’t. MBAs can’t see past the next fiscal quarter.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If the stadium is anywhere near an urban setting only bad design warrants the building of (massive) car parks - and everybody using cars to get there. Shopping centres warrant large car parks because people load up with items. Sports grounds need to get people in and out in tight windows - there’s no contest in car v rail in this respect.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Every IKEA I can think of has the garage in the building and they have many spots as well as people loading large items, so it’s possible. For normal shopping centers I think it’s also mostly indoor/underground stuff (Europe).

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah - between you and me - the real reason is like the castles, fortresses, monasteries and cathedrals of the past a stadium is built as a statement building. Uniquely identifiable as the cultural home of that tribe. I don’t think there’s ever been a trainee architect who wants to design parking garages when they grow up. Some stadiums are a triumph of form over function. Also the large empty surrounding flat areas enforce the impact of the architectural qualities by removing any outside context or reference… but you didn’t hear any of that from me.

            • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know this is only one example but the Tampa Bay Lighting have a parking garage right across from the main entrance and use the wall facing the entrance as a viewing screen so even if you cant/don’t get tickets you can still warch along out front and hear the roar of the stadium. There’s a bar and everything out there

      • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Money. Costs more to build and costs more to maintain. I assume at the time many of them were built the land was cheap enough to not come close to offsetting it.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        For the pendants out there - they all do

        Just not in one country

        You’re the exception, not the norm

        Please note this is a satirical comment, and it’s not my fault you have poor reading comprehension

        I mean /s