• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That is to say there, is zero evidence and no court has ever levied a guilty verdict against any Zionist for the crime.

    A top U.N. court says Gaza genocide is ‘plausible’ but does not order cease-fire.

    Donoghue said the court cannot make a final determination right now on whether Israel is guilty of genocide. But she said that given the deteriorating situation in Gaza, the court has jurisdiction to order measures to protect Gaza’s population from further risk of genocide.

    I find that much more credible than “white replacement theory”.

    Either you’re ignoring all the bombings since the article was written in January or you are ignorant, or both.

    • xhrit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Saying there is a plausable threat of genocide is not conviting someone of genocide. It is like saying a woman has a plausable threat of rape if she walks alone at night in a bad part of town. There is no actual threat of rape, no one is threatining to rape her, there is no one to convit of rape, rape has not actually happened =- but at some time in the future if she keeps walking in the bad part of town at night someone might decide to rape her.