• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I like them cause they cook faster and crisp better than convection ovens. A leaf blower, like the other person said.

    Air fryer, automatic pressure cooker, and electric smoker: three appliances that every home cook should own to step up their meal game. Your food will taste so much better.

    (I mean you haven’t lived until you’ve had ribs that were smoked for 2 hours, stuck in the instant pot for 20 minutes, and then finished off in the broiler or on the grill. No other method tops this technique. Or birria that was pressure cooked instead of the traditional stove method. And now I want ribs and tacos birrias.)

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ew, corpse eating. When will people realise that these disgusting religious practices aren’t okay to talk about in public? Nobody likes your corpse eating cult.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          There’s no way a person who bases their decisions on scientific thinking would eat corpses. Not unless they were in a situation of absolute desperation. A person who bases their decisions on scientific thinking would determine killing is bad, and would just eat plants instead. Even if it cost an extra four dollars per grocery trip.

          Corpse eating happens because of tradition and dogma. Because “that’s the way we’ve always done things.” We indoctrinate children into this blood cult and normalise violence the same way some religions normalise genital mutilation or ritual sacrifice of humans. Hells, the thanksgiving turkey, which is served in the literal shape of its corpse rather than being butchered or processed, is a ritual sacrifice.

          A religion is not defined only by worship of gods, or else Buddhism would not be a religion. A religion can be defined by dogmatic, ritualised, inhumane practices taught to children from birth in the name of tradition. That’s what carnism is. I’ve never seen a defence of carnism that didn’t speak to some idea of “the natural order” or “tradition” or “the gods made them to be our food”, or some other religious nonsense.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s no way a person who bases their decisions on scientific thinking would eat corpses

            Lawl

            person who bases their decisions on scientific thinking would determine killing is bad

            LMAO

            the thanksgiving turkey, which is served in the literal shape of its corpse rather than being butchered or processed

            Right, because turkeys are naturally headless and featherless with their wings and legs tied up. Totally no processing going on at all with them

            is a ritual sacrifice

            You don’t kill a live turkey during thanksgiving, it’s not a fucking sacrifice

            • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I see that you’re only able to argue using words when discussing the Thanksgiving turkey. For which your arguments amount to “but it’s cooked tho” and “but only the consumption of the flesh happens on the day”. Okay, both correct, and both irrelevant. Meanwhile, you’ve responded to all of my core points not with words, logic, or meaning, but with guttural vocalisations of emotion. Thus, I infer that your only argument in favour of the carnist religion is an emotional one, intended not to persuade but to intimidate. So I repeat my claim that no scientifically minded person could agree with your religion.

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I see that you’re only able to argue using words when discussing the Thanksgiving turkey

                Yeah, your other points were so beyond stupid they can only be laughed at

                You’re the kind of vegan people point to when they say all vegans are lunatics with 0 basic brain functionality

                • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Okay have fun using insults to compensate for your lack of having any arguments or evidence.

                • Sunshine @lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You know you lost when you resort to the ad hominem logical fallacy

                  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I never wasn’t insulting them directly, their points are so stupid and ridiculous that I didn’t ever even bother arguing them because that would be a waste of my time

                    Better to point and laugh at the person who refuses to learn than to waste my time trying to teach them

          • letsgo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Can you cite any peer reviewed studies that show scientific thinking necessarily leads away from omnivory?

            • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Gregson, R., Piazza, J., & Boyd, R. L. (2022). ‘Against the cult of veganism’: Unpacking the social psychology and ideology of anti-vegans. Appetite, 178, 106143–106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106143

              Results from our analyses suggest several individual differences that align r/AntiVegan users with the community, including dark entertainment, ex-veganism and science denial.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            A person who bases their decisions on scientific thinking would determine killing is bad

            Science does not produce value judgements.