• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    This better be the most extensively documented, recorded, well guarded and surveiled election in US history. It’s going to have to be if democracy is to survive.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The enemy will be far better organized this time. We are going to see ratfuckery on a level never seen before in the US.

  • Toto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They used computer analysis and past employees to construct an evidence based comparison.

    Not sure what the sarcastic “Look!” was related to. They need to try to present facts above the fold

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The look was they’re finally doing it. Have you not noticed that? They pointed it out in the article. The New York Times has noticeably treated Donald Trump with kid gloves. I don’t know anyone who’s not familiar with that critique.

      • Toto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not sure a day has gone by without a (deserved) critical opinion piece in the NYT in the past 2 months. Not looking to defend anyone but the level of outrage in the public doesn’t need to be matched in headlines. That’s what Fox News does.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Nobody’s talking about opinion pieces here. We’re talking about news. Opinion pieces are not news. They are opinion pieces. The reason they’re upset is that their news division is covering up actual news events for dubious reasons.