$25 to rent the movie, one watch within max 24 hours after you start watching it… Or $5 more to own it. Scammers.

  • omeara4pheonix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Buying the disk is still owning it (which is another $5 less on amazon BTW) though it is not out yet.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What’s the DRM like on a disc copy? I’ll admit that I’m not caught up, it’s been a long time since I bought physical media. Is it revocable?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        With a physical item, first sale doctrine clearly applies, so you can own the movie, and resell it to somebody else, or lend it to your friends, or give it to a library. None of which is possible with a digital DRMed "ownership "

        • xcjs@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not even grey - in the US it is illegal under the DMCA.

          I’m not up to date on ripping tools, though.

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I know that in the EU, if you buy a video game and it runs poorly or not at all because of the DRM put in place by the publisher, you are allowed to use a crack. Dunno if it’s the same for a movie tho.

            • xcjs@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The DMCA supersedes that - it’s still a crime to bypass copy protection mechanisms, and there are very few exceptions to that rule.