fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 days agoThe 1900smander.xyzimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up11.48Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1imageThe 1900smander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·20 days agoEarly 2000’s doesn’t sound odd at all though.
minus-squareBubs12@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·20 days agoBecause that’s referring the 2000’s decade. In terms of centuries, I would say we are still in the early 2000’s and that does feel odd to say.
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-220 days agoI rather meant how it sounds. It’s in the “hundreds”. Two thousands. Twenty hundreds. “Early twenty hundreds” does kind of make it sound like we live in 2224 instead while “early two thousands” sounds like 2002. I could have written it better.
minus-squareBubs12@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·20 days agoWell you also wouldn’t say ten hundreds for the 1000’s. I think it’s just a quirk of the being the first century in a millennia.
minus-squareapostrofail@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·20 days agothe 2000s* decade early 2000s*
Early 2000’s doesn’t sound odd at all though.
Because that’s referring the 2000’s decade. In terms of centuries, I would say we are still in the early 2000’s and that does feel odd to say.
I rather meant how it sounds. It’s in the “hundreds”.
Two thousands.
Twenty hundreds.
“Early twenty hundreds” does kind of make it sound like we live in 2224 instead while “early two thousands” sounds like 2002.
I could have written it better.
Well you also wouldn’t say ten hundreds for the 1000’s. I think it’s just a quirk of the being the first century in a millennia.
Early second millennium CE
the 2000s* decade
early 2000s*
Early 2000s*