• Soviet Pigeon@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    The position, that state and church should be divided, while also everyone should have the right to believe whatever they like, is something from the classic liberalism. Not what you have now, but the kind of liberalism which was on the rise, when also the bourgeoisie got more and more influence. I guess it is understandable what I try to say.

    It was also common to say by the german communists after the second world war, that it would be the communists who would defend the basic bourgeois rights (freedom of speach, freedom of arts, freedom of press, freedom of religion etc.), while the bourgeoisie would attack it constantly. What I try to say is, that ppl on those screenshots are stupid and simply don’t understand anything.

    Also, where does this “white christian” thing comes from? I never heard of this and also never encountered a marxist, which would blame something on christians, which are white. I can imagine that maybe there is political tendency if you have christians, which are white, but the cause of such tendency is neither being white nor being a christian.

    • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 days ago

      Also, where does this “white christian” thing comes from? I never heard of this and also never encountered a marxist, which would blame something on christians, which are white. I can imagine that maybe there is political tendency if you have christians, which are white, but the cause of such tendency is neither being white nor being a christian.

      Persecution complex needs to keep complexing.