• Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    Tbh, if you’re working that high up the chain that O’Leary calls you personally, you probably are a very wealthy workaholic anyways.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nobody should give a shit what another reality TV show host business marketing shill grifter has to say about labor regulations. He’s the last person I would care about an opinion from on the topic. Not seeing a link, did the article also include a response from labor leaders?

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dreams-crap-kevin-oleary-slams-110400900.html

      Unsurprisingly, the article is more nuanced than the title.

      For example, he states he has fired people in the past for not answering an after hours emergency, while the title seems to me to say he would fire people despite the new law.

      The article does include a response and background from labor leaders in Australia, as that is the most recent country to enact this law.

      But I entirely agree about his character, and he’s the worst person on that shark tank show too. I dont know ive ever agreed with a quote of his in an article.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If it’s a new regulation to not answer phones off the clock, isn’t firing the employee for it illegal?

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes. But you can best believe they will find something else to fire you for. If you have nothing, then it’s an easy case win for you.

  • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m sorry but I don’t think its that crazy to want your employees to communicate with you outside of working hours.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Oh friend, that’s because you’re a moron. A lot of managers are, you’re a perfect example of that right now 😮‍💨

    • karl_chungus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      If you expect them to be available outside of working hours, the hours they’re available should be paid, and therefore are working hours.

      There is no communication necessary for work that cannot take place during working hours. What you’re actually arguing for is free labor.

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No, sometimes you just need to tell an employee something, and then have them verify they understand the information. In my opinion that does not qualify as work.

        • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Is the something you need to tell them related to work?

          And is the verification you reference something you expect them to provide as an employee?

          I should hope you are able to make the connection without having your hand held further.

          • licheas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            on the off chance they’re…not…

            spoiler

            That’s work. and all work must legally be compensated for.

        • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If your boss can’t figure that shit out during working hours they need to get their shit straight.

          I’m not going to be on call for zero compensation because you’re scatterbrained, inept or understaffed

          • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Because everything important happens during every employees working hours, and it is inconceivable that a plan could change for any reason while you aren’t clocked in.

            If you want work to get done you have to be coordinated. Just text back, its not that fucking hard.

            I would agree that your boss shouldn’t expect you to answer at all hours of the day or even remotely quickly, but if you literally never answer anything then I have very little sympathy for you when you get fired.

            • eskimofry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              There shouldn’t be anything that requires the employee not be informed the next working day. If it’s such an emergency you can’t wait then you should call your doctor not your employee.

    • dumbass
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nah, its now we’re putting some restraints on these children who have been free to do what ever and now they’re having an entitled little tantrum about it, because god fobid the peasants get to relax.

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Up next on the news: abusive boss wonders why he can’t retain staff. Should the board step in? Shareholders say yes

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why can’t these regulations be actual crimes, with criminal consequences for the perpetrator. And if he’s ordering someone else to do the firing, it’s “conspiracy to commit regulatory fraud”.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’ll fire workers… what workers exactly? As far as I can tell, he hasn’t actually run a business in 25 years. He got rich when Mattel bought his company in 1999, but then they fired him. He invested in a storage facility company, was on the board of directors but never actually had any employees reporting to him, and then he sold that investment, making him more money.

    Since then, he’s had a number of vanity projects name after himself: O’Leary Funds, O’Leary Ventures, O’Leary Books, O’Leary Fine Wines, I don’t know if any of them are still in business, but if they are, I can’t imagine he has more than a handful of employees.

    Now he’s just a reality TV personality, so of course he’s going to say bullshit that gets him in the spotlight.

    Why would anybody take advice from a reality TV personality who hasn’t managed any employees in a quarter of a century? Especially given that he’s probably just saying bullshit to get his name in the spotlight again.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is guy’s grift is playing daddy capitalist while real owners do actual capitalism.

      A useful whore for the regime.