French immigrants are eating our pets!
You must log in or register to comment.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?
There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.
They’re often too smooth.
Can we bring that back?
The shell looks ai generated though, if it was photoshopped it would’ve been a snail shell used for the source image.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.
It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, they would have used a picture of a real shell.
Edit: plus the cat head looks weird where it connects to the head, and the markings don’t look right to me.
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.
Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though
Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.
Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.
Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.
I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
Your reference is ancient and dusty and it makes me feel old. Stop it.
…you know people made fake pictures before image generation, right?
They made fake pictures before computers existed too.
This obviously can’t be true, how did they do it without Photoshop? /s
I mean, optical illusions have been used to fool audiences for years.
https://youtube.com/shorts/bsyRnmdceqQ?si=SfUM2mssqc1sjvNt
This is a motion picture of course but the idea is “faking” an image isn’t too far off.
Hehe, I know, I’m just being silly - the /s on my message means it’s in a sarcastic tone :) but thanks for taking the time to share that video!
I’m an idiot, thank you for the explanation, I got got
I’ve seen the cave paintings deer and horses everywhere but when I look around nothing but rocks and trees.
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.”
Back2thefuture_iknowthisone.png
That’s a song by the police, right?
Iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg
LOL
Miao
Ignorant Americans, never even heard of the common snailcat
Where the fuck are you from that they aren’t called catsnails? Odd. Been catsnails here since I can remember.
deleted by creator
Check the snail house. The swirl has two endings. Definitely AI
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Deleted by creator
created by deletor
Or maybe your expectations from ai detection are too high.
I have two of those cats. I still can’t catch them when its time to go to bed.
No spooky eyes, no extra limbs, no eery smile? - 100% real, genuine photograph! 👍
It’s a snat. They are not easy to catch, because they are fast. Also, they never land on their shell.
cute snat…
That’s clearly a cail
Are we all looking at the same snussy?
We get them a lot around here. They don’t make for good pets, but they keep the borogoves at bay.
Which is great, honestly. Borogoves themselves are fine, but it’s not worth the risk letting them get all mimsy.
Such a cute kitty snail! Can you post just the picture?
Its an “AI generated image at snail” :3
Detection for snail is positive.
I wanted to get a cat but I discovered I was allergic to the slime trail.
yeah just shopped
It’s not, look at the shell
That’s a normal housecat. Not sure what people are confused about
Chat is the picture real?
It’s a real valid picture in png format.
Oui, biensur!
HAS SCIENCE GONE TO FAR?!
