1. Mod of [email protected] posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @[email protected]

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
    62·
    2 months ago

    Is there someone I should read? I read some of the Wikipedia article to try to educate myself but I didn’t get all that far.

    Edit: I think the fact that I made someone so salty they felt the need to downvote this comment means I’m doing something right.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7·
      2 months ago

      Discussing the matter with actual anarchists is preferable. There are fewer central agreed-upon texts to anarchism (appropriately enough, lmao), and many of those that remain influential are… quite thick. Kropotkin is available if you are the patient sort.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
        71·
        2 months ago

        I read the abridged version of the abridged version of Kropotkin just now. I like it quite a lot. I more or less stand by my assessment of the flaws in it, as compared with an approach like the founders of the US, but it sounds like good stuff. I think like a lot of things the devil is in the details.

        I am mostly being snarky about the laughable brand of faux-anarchism that got me banned and deleted in this instance, not trying to throw too much shade at real anarchism.