1. Mod of [email protected] posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @[email protected]

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes they didn’t understand it either, but you have to keep in mind which community they commented in.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Erm, which they are you referring to? Nobody’s saying elections are better than anarchism, and as I’ve said below (on my alt account of the same name), I don’t see how saying voting for Harris is better than voting for Stein contradicts election principles. It’s not like Greta endorses Stein either.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There is a detailed body of theoretical works in Anarchism about how Electoralism is counter-productive and mostly just distracts from the real work that is needed. This isn’t about Harris or Stein. Coming into an Anarchist community and arguing about the need to vote for a candidate is similar to coming to a Vegan community and starting to argue that eggs are better than meat and maybe a little meat is not so bad after all.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree with this thread, which I saw a while ago.

          Your can’t un-spill a cup of water, but you can keep it upright.

          Also, the electoralism wasn’t out of nowhere. It was pretty much 1/4 of what the post was saying

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            You are again missing the point. No one claimed that you are not allowed to vote for the lesser evil if that is something you want to do.

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              But you should not be voting for the way-lesser evil are asking others to do so (perhaps while continuing to emphasize that the system will still be broken)? If that’s what you’re arguing, could we take this to where I’ve replied below so the overall argument is more public and easier to follow? thx

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Sorry, can you please rephrase or fix the grammar in your post above? I don’t get what you are trying to say.

                  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    No that is not what I am arguing then. Voting for the lesser evil is often the right choice. If I was a citizen of the USA I would certainly vote for Harris tomorrow as the lesser evil, but that is a personal choice and I trust that most US based anarchists are sensible enough to do the same.

                    The main problem with electorialism is not the voting itself, its the spectacle around it and the waste of effort and money to promote the candidates and all the (self) gaslighting that people do. Coming to an anarchist space and doing that will at best get you ridiculed, but in this case the mod decided to show these people the door.