• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Agreed, but they would have to pass legislation and imagine the protests and media shit storm Trump would face if he started revoking citizenship. It would be a massive time and energy suck for the GOP.

    I’m all for anything Biden can do that will distract this Congress and administration from being able to do other shit.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      The current Congress is far less effective with split control than the fully Republican controlled Congress we have coming. The President can veto congressional legislation, but does not have the authority to redefine their power.

      Trump wouldn’t be the one revoking citizenship. It would be Congress. He’ll just point the finger.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Why are people still discussing parliamentary bullshit like this? The man promised to be a dictator. He will have absolute power.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yup, I understand that. But he would have to get alignment from the few moderate republicans and senators in border states to start revoking citizenship. The GOP will have a slim majority and it will have its Joe Manchin to contend with. Old school republicans like Collins, Murkowski, Curtis are going to have a LOT of power.

        Moreover, if you start kicking Americans out of America, that shit is going to be a media cluster fuck. New immigrants and kids of immigrants that voted for Trump will be forced ask “who’s next?”

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          What does he care? He’s not getting elected again. If he has a third term, it’ll be through systemic manipulation, not election.

          Congress doesn’t need gubernatorial support to denaturalize. They can use the Naturalization Act of 1906 to change the requirements for qualifying for or maintaining naturalization, allowing for immediate revocation of citizenship and subsequent deportation.

          ”there must be strict compliance with all the congressionally imposed prerequisites to the acquisition of citizenship. Failure to comply with any of these conditions renders the certificate of citizenship ‘illegally procured,’ and naturalization that is unlawfully procured can be set aside.”

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            What the fuck does the law matter when they’ll literally just be deporting people by the millions and not letting them back in?

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              I’m referring to denaturalizing existing citizens to be deported, which has been an unused congressional power since 1906.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Why do you think they have to pass legislation? We just overwhelmingly elected a man who promised to be a dictator.

      Do you not know how dictatorships work?