• yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    We can’t fix global warming, let alone anything else, if the trend of alt-right radicalization of an entire generation continues — already a 30 point swing in just a decade, as evidenced by this last election. It’s a global phenomenon. There is simply no reason why a child should be on YouTube or Instagram or TikTok. And btw, it’s extremely easy to enforce, because in Australia they’ll just fine the corporation for every infraction. Camera + ID = problem solved.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Camera + ID = zero privacy for anyone

      is a child watching tom scott really a bad thing?

      also if someone doesn’t want to provide service to Australia because they don’t want to handle IDs, how would you block Australians? ip bans won’t work because a child can use vpns, and if you want to verify by foreign ID for this then you still need ID checking

      australia doing this makes it worse for everyone in the world

      also a child could also just ask their parents to verify for them

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Let’s research the effects of social media on teenagers before making up our minds. As for anonymity on public forums — maybe on unpopular websites, we can keep that up, but for the big ones where everyone congregates, we tried anonymous trolling for 20 years and, as a result, every democracy is dying. We can’t maintain civilization without shared space of public knowledge, and that has been severely degraded by trolls and foreign agitators.

        • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          root cause solution: outlaw advertising

          advertising is what makes social media bad, because it creates an incentive system such that more traffic = more profits, and so companies are incentivised to create conflict (radicalise people) so they stay on the site more

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Jordan Peterson was making 50k a month on Patreon when he flipped his shit in 2016. His videos were unmonetized. Similarly, creators are very vulnerable to audience capture.

            If we get rid of advertising on YouTube they’d adopt a subscription model which would suffer the exact same fate.

            I’m telling you, easiest thing is to keep kids out. There’s just no reason for kids to be on Instagram and for foreign agitators to be using social media pretending to be Americans.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah Facebook isn’t anonymous at all and is full of more trolls, liars, bad faith actors, and corpos than anywhere else.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      As an American I think the color key of that chart is designed to annoy me… Actually now that I look closer I am sure the whole thing is designed to piss me off. Why aren’t they using the same date ranges?

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The charts seem to show the time span for each country where the opinions of men and women were fairly similar and how they’ve diverged since. Some countries started diverging more recently than others.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      The radicalisation of young men stems from blaming them for being straight and white. It also stems from a dividing culture of men and women. This is the product of all of those “girls / boys” memes.

      They grew up in a good, progressive world, where they understand sexualities and understand mental health. They grew up being taught that it’s okay to be diverse and that it’s okay to be as you are. But then it turns around and suddenly they’re all to blame for their race, or their orientation, things that they cannot prevent–Well, no wonder they’re going backwards. Once their favourite games and hobbies are infiltrated by wokeness and forcefulness, this is how they respond.

      Should’ve realised that perhaps forcing social equity isn’t a good idea, and blaming young men and boys for the faults of society doesn’t gain their favour. Nah, instead let’s double-down even.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Honestly, you kinda said it yourself. The whole “woke” phenomenon doesn’t exist in real life. It’s a purely online reactionary movement. The young men I work with have zero issues; they live their lives in peace. Then they get online and are told by the manosphere and red pill communities that everyone hates men and that being masculine is bad and all kinds of other UNTRUE crap that has nothing to do with reality.

        I’m not saying young men aren’t struggling. They are, don’t get me started. I’m saying that the whole game of gender wars is happening exclusively online; it’s mostly imaginary; and it’s toxic as fuck.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’ve experienced wokeness in real life. I was told by a woman that I hate Taylor Swift because of sexism.

          No, I hate her because she’s an environmental hazard and bland. There is also a lot of mockery of lonely men, where their anxieties and fears are handwaved away

          You also can’t say it isn’t present in real-life. Online interconnectivity is reality now.

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            There’s a big difference between a sexist defense of Taylor Swift by an ignorant fan (much as men might react to the news that red meat is carcinogenic), and the hyperbolic reactionary paranoia that everything about masculinity is under attack by a woke feminist Marxist mob, which is what Jordan Peterson claims.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Nope. The radicalization is a global phenomenon that started in 2016, coinciding perfectly with the rise of the online manosphere and red-pill movement.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          It goes much more than that. It started as the rise of atheism, where impressionable young boys, wanting to be rebels discovered the dopamine rush of dunking on religious wackjobs like the Westboro Baptist Church. Not blaming atheism, just pointing out it started here.

          It then extended further to video games and gamergate. Then they started getting political, which naturally led them down to 2016 and current times.

          The point remains that the majority of them blamed wokeness

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Sure, atheism was a big online movement in the 2010 era, but it was co-opted in 2015 by the “intellectual dark web,” from Sam Harris to Joe Rogan and the Weinstein fuckheads. That’s when things really started to get bad.

            The atheist movement was already fizzling out after the death of Hitchens a few years earlier, and was then metastasizing into something ugly (as you said, video games, anti woke bullshit), until it was eventually subsumed by reactionaries like Jordan Peterson, who burst onto the scene with his crypto-Christian nonsense. Joe Rogan started to get more and more conspiretarded, and the rest is history.

            Anyway, the YouTube alt-right pipeline is a well researched and documented phenomenon and when I have to spend all day arguing with 15 year olds about why Andrew Tate sucks, please take my word for it, they need to be kept off of social media. They’re too stupid and vulnerable.

            • goat@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You can’t educate them or parent your own child? I don’t want to have my ID forced online just to engage in social media.

              • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Apparently not. Right wing radicalization has all but won worldwide. It’s clear we can’t have nice things. Maybe we can save the smaller platforms? I’m open to other ideas, personally.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        This is straight up standard right wing propaganda. A much simpler explanation is that the platforms are feeding people false realities for profit. Rage gets the most engagement. Right wing propaganda works extremely well for that and as an added benefit it produces cohorts who vote in the interest of the platform owners. It’s a twofer.