Summary
Avery Davis Bell faced severe complications with a miscarriage in Georgia, where restrictive abortion laws delayed her necessary medical care.
At 18 weeks pregnant, she was forced to wait for life-saving treatment due to Georgia’s abortion restrictions, which prevent immediate intervention unless a medical emergency escalates.
Bell’s experience highlights the risks imposed by post-Dobbs state laws, with maternal deaths rising faster in states with strict abortion bans.
The law’s impact on Bell’s experience highlights the inhumane consequences of abortion restrictions, which can lead to unnecessary suffering and even death.
“God’s will.”
You’re never going to be able to argue against that. No amount of explaining to them the atrocious cruelty of things like this trumps “God’s will” for the anti-abortionists.
If you have a miscarriage, God’ will. If you die and your baby lives, God’s will. If you both die, God’s will. If you would have lived if you had just had an abortion, YOU MURDERER!!!
I think it’s god’s will when men aren’t able to get erections. It’s not natural to use viagara or cialis. Surely the same people so in tune with god’s will would agree with that one, right?
You would think.
They also seem to have no problem with things like stents or insulin pumps if they need them.
Not to mention eyeglasses.
I swear, the amount of times I’ve had someone complain about abortions or gay people being unnatural while at the same time wearing eyeglasses and living in a place filled to the brim with televisions, phones, computers, radios, electrical lights, internet, electric ovens…
I mean, you can’t argue against it philosophically, but you can argue against it legally, which is all that matters.
At least, you used to…
I think it’s God’s Will™ that I’m about to push them in front of oncoming traffic.
That’s not an accurate take. There are some pro-lifers who are like that but most are in favour of exceptions when it’s to save the mother’s life, or the fetus has a fatal deformity.
They just don’t (want to) understand that the intentionally vague wording of anti-abortion laws makes it basically impossible for doctors to perform medically indicated abortions until it’s too late to save the patient.
If you claim to be “pro-life” the least you can do is advocate for clear definitions of the medical circumstances where abortive medical procedures are permitted.
Most? Maybe. The ones in legislatures? Not so much. Especially not in Idaho, where even the life of the mother doesn’t matter.
But you’re right that they don’t want to understand. They know what these “life of the mother excepted” laws lead to in practice. Especially now. And yet they haven’t changed their minds. They’re just putting their hands over their ears and saying, “LA LA LA LA LA!”