• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    … the back doors that have child locks already on them so THEY CANT be opened by said children…?

    That’s what argument you want to use? Seriously? Lmfao the shit people come up with sometimes.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      An emergency release should bypass the child locks. Looks like you’re the one lacking imagination.

      • Gawdl3y@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The emergency release does bypass the child lock. That’s why it’s in a hidden spot in the back doors, because otherwise the child lock would be pointless.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        And the reason why it’s hard to access is so a kid can’t accidentally open it and fall out….

        Having it bypass the child locks defeats the singular purpose of the child lock lmfao. What is with these arguments?

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can have adults sitting at the back with child lock on, you want any emergency system to bypass other systems that might block them.

          Please, never work in safety.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            You should NEVER have an adult in the back with the child lock on… since they couldn’t escape in an emergency….

            Normal vehicles don’t have a bypass, so an adult would be locked in any vehicle if it was on….

            Tesla’s atleast have a feature to overcome this….

            It’s quite sad that you needed this explained…. Do you even own a drivers license? If you do, please turn it in for the safety of everyone on the road, not just the adults you lock in the back seat…

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I guess you never forgot anything in your life.

              Did you know you shouldn’t carry people in your trunk? Yet by law the trunk needs to have a (glow in the dark!) way to be opened from the inside if it’s not a hatchback vehicle. Crazy right?

              An emergency measure has a purpose, it’s to be used in an emergency. If it can be bypassed then it fails as an emergency measure. What’s funny is that Tesla agrees because the emergency door release bypasses child lock, like it should.

              • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Sure I have, and adults can be locked in the back of a normal car with zero way out.

                Yet you want to argue that a hard to access release is bad…?

                When this problem in a worse way has already ex is Ted for decades…?

                Childlocks have zero override, and Teslas do, and yet the argument is child safety…? It’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety. So now there is conflicting safety laws…… you didn’t see that coming now did you? Yeah…

                Yes I know it overrides it… that’s not the argument. The argument was, children could be back there, it’s a stupid argument since you can lock them in the back to ANY vehicle, (but Tesla as you stupidly pointed out to ruin your own argument….), so to cry the children can’t find it… is the stupidest fucking argument that could be used to decry this…

                Do you need this explained again? Or can you finally comprehend why the argument about children is a red herring?

                Trunks don’t have a manual release in the back…. That why they require one…. If they had a manual handle, they wouldn’t require the other handle. As you said hardback don’t need one, why? Because you can crawl into the front where you have access to a manual handle.

                You seem to know the rules, but not why, yet you insult that I shouldn’t be in safety? Maybe you should comprehend the rules instead of just knowing them, massive difference and you’ve shown your massively lacking surface knowledge while defending “children could be back there). You know wheee they can be locked in with no escape in ANY OTHER VEHILCE… lmfao you’re not very bright dude.

                But I’m done explaining simple things to someone who can only argue, the children!!! While missing the entire point….

                  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    It’s all child safety, yet you can’t grasp that?

                    Last message.

                    Child locks are so children can’t open the door and fall out of a moving vehicle, Tesla’s emergency release overrides said child lock. If it was easily accessible a child could use it and fall out of moving vehicle still. So hence why it’s not an easily accessible handle. Since doing that would endanger children in more situations… you’re a bloody moron if you can’t comprehend this.

                    Hence why it’s marginally hard to access… so it’s not randomly pulled.

                    Got it yet? Or do you need some diagrams? Because that’s too much work.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The ones that have to be enabled and I haven’t stated thoughts on either way?

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yes so what difference does a hard to make emergency access do when in any normal car they can be locked in…?

        It’s hard to access so kids CANT open the door while it’s moving and fall out. Thats why vehicles have the child lock feature available… it’s quite sad that you need this explained.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            And? A child can be locked in the back of any vehicle with no way out, atleast teslas have a way to still get out… leave it on, and no law an adult is locked back there, with no override to get out. And that’s your Honda, not even a fancy electric car….

            The point is, they’re crying about children being locked in the back, yet any current vehicle you’ve been able to chose to do that for bloody decades already, yet a car with a feature to overcome that is being decried. You were locked in the back of your parents car, it’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety.

            The hypocrisy that people show just to be mad at something with one actually comprehending why…