Wait, I’ve seen this one before

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I don’t really buy it. Rome fell for reasons a professional historian of Rome has told me are still unclear, but I don’t really see a lot of parallels in our big problems, which are very new and untested.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Elites hoarding wealth to the detriment of the polity and mindless obedience to utterly incompetent cretins are truly timeless contributors, though.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, I realise it’s kinda weird to post this after talking about how familiar a lot of things in Rome were, but in the narrow scope of existential problems the overlap is limited.

        Liberal democracies work very differently from autocracies. The weather isn’t a mystery of the gods, it’s self-inflicted. Rome kept it’s population in check through massive natural and to a lesser degree artificial mortality, while we have great medicine but ever-lower fertility rates. Roman peasants may have been vaguely aware of the distant land of Italy, we have information overload conveyed by machines even 20th century people struggle with. When we have a plague, it’s less about escaping it, and more about convincing people they should.

        Some problems are timeless - or at least haven’t been dealt with yet - but I feel like putting it in terms of Rome like this is misleading and can be used to justify all kinds of things. When I’ve seen this meme posted before, it’s usually a lead-up to really chuddy comments about immigration or loss of traditional values.