• LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Right, because homeless people won’t just sleep on the floor. Bitch they’ll sleep anywhere with a roof where they won’t be bothered, let alone a place with walls and basic heating/AC. Filthy liars! Why the fuck is America so hostile towards its citizens and why do they just take it?

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      where they won’t be bothered

      so you’re saying we need to employ people to specifically bother them. thanks for your suggestion, and please feel free to use our suggestion box if you have more ideas.

      • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        Not what I said. That is a logical extrapolation of a measure that would actually target the homeless as opposed to public transit users. An extrapolation you made. Don’t strawman me you dishonest asshat!

        The best way to fight homeless people is always to prevent their growth, aka making livable/affordable cities. Look at the Netherlands or nordic countries for referee (as almost fucking always…).

        Tho that’s not what my comment was about, I was just pointing out that this shit clearly targets the average transit user, while barely affecting the homeless. It’s unprovoked hostility for no rhyme or reason! People should be fined or lose jobs for this!

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          24 days ago

          That comment was a joke, they were imitating the sarcasm of the original reply to the subway, from the point of view of an anti-homeless organization only looking to “deal” with the homeless, perhaps using your comment as an excuse to do so.

          • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Honestly hard to tell what level of sarcasm we’re on. As in either, “Haha, that’s how they would reply” or jokingly dismissing what I said as stupid/hypocritical with my sentence twisted. People here usually use “/s” to denote that the prior wasn’t serious.

            • naught101@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              24 days ago

              the “use our suggestion box” wasn’t so much a hint as a giant sign in flashing neon lights

              • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                24 days ago

                You’d be surprised how many people talk like that. It’s a common way to make fun of someone.

            • dufkm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              24 days ago

              Unfortunately, adding a cringey “/s” takes all the fun out of sarcasm. It’s better not to flag it and let the reader be responsible for detecting the sarcasm, at the cost of occasionally being misunderstood.

      • lurklurk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 days ago

        They kinda do though… The worse it seems to be homeless, the more desperate people will be to keep their job and home.

        It’s certainly worse for most people, but you couldn’t have an American system without it