• Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      not sure about generation but 1 or 2 election cycles for sure. this is the main problem with the outcome, it will be presented as a rejection of action and not of the voice itself. I would like to see the case from both major parties for what next, they both have said they have a plan so let’s hear it

      • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Constitutional change isn’t on the cards, not in the near future. We’re not doing another referendum. Dutton fucked up when he said he would support one on just constitutional recognition alone because the conservatives do not support it. Sure, the government can legislate a voice but there’s always a chance that it will be dismantled like every other advisory group - that’s why it needed to be enshrined in the constitution. I think there’s more that can be achieved for voice and treaty now at the state level. That might even be more effective because states are responsible for health, education, child protection and justice, which are all areas that can be aligned to the close the gap outcomes. I would support a federal treaty process, hands down, but I’m sceptical that the majority of Australia will.

        • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          i agree, you have a good idea about the states. might be a way to move things forward. ultimately we need a sizable cultural change nationwide to really get things moving at a national level. im embarressed we arent quite there yet

        • samson@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          States are responsible for everything in our federal system, only the federal government is limited in scope. A state voice will be a truly great thing to pursue for each state.

          • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The Uluru Statement literally asked for constitutional reforms.

            I’m not sure the indigenous peoples of this country are willing to work with the state governments. Obviously they’re many people, and some of them are/will be willing to go down that path. But it’s not what they asked for in 2017.

            The only thing that’s changed since 2017 is 60% of the country clearly stated they not willing to acknowledge the indigenous peoples of this country. I think reconciliation is further away than it was a few months ago. As some have said the road forward isn’t always a straight line… but this has been a pretty big step backwards.

            • samson@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know, I’m Aboriginal. I completely supported the voice as it stood. I think that it’s something worth persuing due to how much states control in our system, but it could very well lead to fragmentation etc. It’s definitely been a massive step backwards and I think there’s going to be a lot off the cards from now for a long time sadly.

              • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The thing is the states were unanimously in line with the national consensus on this. The only outliers were a few tiny pockets (like remote communities of indigenous people and a handful of inner city suburbs).

                The more I come to terms with the referendum the more I’m convinced that any attempt to move the needle on this issue is doomed to failure. It’s a sure path to losing an election and giving whoever wins a mandate to entrench the status quo even stronger than it already is.

                I said it was a step backwards yesterday but I think I was wrong. It’s a reality check. I think the referendum has brought to light what the Australian people really think (and we are clearly divided on this issue, don’t forget almost ten million people voted yes…). As shitty as it is to learn how many people are against us, it’s better to know that than to be blissfully ignorant.

                We have failed to constitutionally enshrined a Voice, but doing so still needs to be the next thing we do on this subject. It’s more important than it ever was. The people who voted No need to admit they were wrong and I want to see evidence that millions of people have changed their mind before I can see any path forward towards real meaningful change.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Constitutional recognition seems pretty much dead. There have been predictions made already that such widespread rejection of what was a very safe, conservative-friendly, good faith proposal from Indigenous activists will cause many to give up on this approach and shift further towards the tactics used by Thorpe and the Blak Sovereign Movement. They obviously have even less chance of succeeding within the current political and social climate, so it may take some time for any progress to be made at a national level.

      • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s pretty much what Noel Pearson was saying a few days before the vote. I don’t really blame them. Australia just overwhelmingly rejected a very modest invitation for reconciliation, I don’t really see what else Indigenous leaders can do. It’s still worthwhile to fight for treaty and truth. But voice was kind of the easier option of the 3, so the other 2 are going to be very difficult.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I suspect some of that generation of Indigenous activists will step back now. They’ve been at this for decades, making more and more concessions to try to get bipartisan support and have ultimately been betrayed at the final hour by the Coalition. Must feel pretty soul destroying.

          • Nonameuser678@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a member of another marginalised group I have always looked up to these Indigenous leaders for their passion and strength in fighting for change. My community supported the voice because we fundamentally believe in the idea of marginalised groups being able to have a greater say over the policies and laws that affect us. This is a great loss, not just for Indigenous Australians, but for all people who want to see structural change in their lifetime.

    • seiryth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally need to wait for the boomers to die out. Yes there’s good ones but the majority are spoilt, entitled and easily influenced by the right and traditional media.