• scarabic@lemmy.worldEnglish
    13·
    2 个月前

    Doesn’t know the book: check Casually dismisses the entire topic of moderating children’s content intake: check

    It’s pretty clear you don’t know what you’re talking about on any level here.

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      11·
      2 个月前

      Sounds like you’re having a bad day. I even gave you a quote from the article that answers your exact question. Everything okay at home?

      • scarabic@lemmy.worldEnglish
        12·
        2 个月前

        I’m responding to this:

        I haven’t read Naked Lunch but from what I know of it, I doubt it has anything kids can’t get on the Internet nowadays.

        • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          11·
          2 个月前

          So you took one sentence out of context and used it to dismiss the rest of the comment with objections that had already been addressed by the parts you dismissed?

          • scarabic@lemmy.worldEnglish
            11·
            2 个月前

            I may be over focusing on that one part of your comment but it does stand out from the rest as rather asinine and contributing nothing to the point.

            • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              11·
              2 个月前

              Nah, mate. Wanna take a guess at what actually does stand out as rather asinine and contributing nothing to the point?

              • scarabic@lemmy.worldEnglish
                11·
                2 个月前

                The part where you implied something must be wrong in my personal life because I didn’t give your comment the response you think it deserves? You’re right - that too.

                • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                  11·
                  2 个月前

                  I didn’t imply that. You did by leaving an overly hostile response to a comment about an article you didn’t read with objections that were addressed before you left your comment.