These folks don’t deserve sympathy when karma comes knocking, they are akin to mass murderers. The media can fuck right off

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      My opinion: correct, I agree

      Objective reality: rights are essentially made up opinions you can make a good argument for

      • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Rights are things that the majority of the populace believes, to be true sentiments, but usually is blocked by bureaucracy that profits off the lack thereof.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That would make sense for this case, but what about the right to freedom from enslavement? Most of America did not agree with that for a while. I would argue it was still a right. What about gay marriage? Majority of Americans disagreed with it until recently. And I’m not sure that one was ever about money.

          • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I think the majority argument is skewed for alot of those due to the nature of our journalism and reporting through US history. I don’t think that a majority of people viewed gay marriage for example as something that should be outlawed, but it was something unfamiliar and they didn’t have enough points of reference in their life to base their argument off of. As it became more mainstream, people just kind of went ‘whatever’, the radicals (religious) get the spotlight from the media but I grew up in a hyper conservative household, and even we were fine with and had friends who were gay. My roommate in college was gay and the only person who had anything off to say was my grandmother who grew up in the 50s+60s.

            I think i should shift my statement to say “rights are things that the majority of the people believe to be true, only if it affects a large enough amount of the people”

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    A better way to communicate this imo is to say Healthcare should under no circumstances be a capitalist market driven (or influenced) commodity. Ever. In any way, shape or form.

    Saying it’s a human right (although I agree 100%) gives conservatives a talking point because, “iT cOsTs MoNeY aNd ReSoUrCeS!”

    It’s not a market driven commodity. Full stop. Nobody has a desire for cancer treatments or radiation therapy. Nobody has a desire to shop around for competitor pricing when they break their leg.

    We need full socialized healthcare. No millionaires, no CEOs, no board of directors, no investors making millions. Just well paid doctors, nurses and support staff, with intelligent people making necessary decisions, not decisions for shareholders or profits.

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    now if you apply the same logic to food, shelter, education, and the other necessities of basic life, you’ll see why socialists exist, and understand why all wage labor under capitalism is a form of slavery

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Healthcare is only available due to our advanced nature as a society. It shouldn’t be considered a human right, it takes resources, education, and effort to achieve. It isn’t necessary, though as an advanced civilization we should make an effort to keep everyone as healthy as possible; it benefits our society directly.

    Safety, Freedom from harm, Freedom of expression, The right to pursue an education, all great human rights.

    Insurance, or companies who hedge bets against you - collecting, and then fighting to pay out – that should be HEAVILY regulated like the gambling industry. Sure, the odds are stacked against you - but Insurance companies should be REQUIRED BY LAW to follow doctors recommendations, whichever doctor you choose.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      it takes resources, education, and effort to achieve

      Yeah. Duh. So fucking what?

      Freckly, you entire argument reeks of cowardice.

      Oh, and btw - healthcare as a right does not, in fact, prop up private health insurance. Dork. Like, literally the most logical path to healthcare as a right would be a single payer system. Which would abolish the companies gambling on my health.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            17 hours ago

            haha, an “anarchist” who wants universal human-rights healthcare. That’s a hot take.

              • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                So you’re a libertarian and not an anarchist, haha

                You may want to learn a little bit more of the history behind anarchism. Because you’re wrong. Many facets of anarchism are exactly that.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Don’t work for, never have worked for, and family has never worked in any capacity for the medical industry whatsoever. Not medically adjacent, or connected with the medical industry in any way. I’m simply a pragmatist. Did you read anything I wrote or did you just react to the “It shouldn’t be considered a human right” without any regard for the rest of the context?

        Should you be forced to work in order to provide care to someone because they have a “human right” to healthcare? Which human right prevails there? The other persons right to healthcare, or your right not to be enslaved? How do you propose ensuring that everyone; all 8 billion people on earth, obtain that healthcare without forcing everyone into servitude?

        There aren’t enough doctors, medical professionals, or infrastructure to support healthcare as a human right. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t strive toward it, but it shouldn’t be labeled as such.

        I can see why this place’s followers are called Lemmings.

        • demesisx@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          🤡

          forcing everyone into servitude

          TLDR

          You aren’t proving me wrong. Only rich medical professionals use that exact phrasing.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Ah, truly a masterstroke of wit. ‘Cry harder’—so concise, so devastating. I can only stand in awe of your rhetorical prowess. You’ve bested me completely; I yield to your unparalleled intellect.