• PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s fascist, but the idea that we have to stop fighting for social issues to address the concerns of blue-collar workers is both insulting to blue-collar workers and deeply dangerous to the people we fight for social issues for.

    The reason the American left fights for social issues primarily is because half the American left are neoliberals with no interest in economic reform of any serious kind, not because there is some arbitrary limit of how many votes can go towards socially progressive bills and economically progressive bills.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I agree with you, your point is kind of ancillary. It’s not now, nor has it ever been, my argument that the left is obliged to abandon social issues in order to court labor.

      My point is that I made a simple observation of fact and was then called a fascist apologist for having done so.

      I personally don’t know how we reconcile the social conservatism of blue-collar Americans with the labor progressivism that so many of them obviously want.

      I just think that it has to be talked about and that ignoring it or calling union activists, like myself, fascists, is not productive in any way shape or form.

      There has to be a solution, and pretending like the problem doesn’t exist and that people like myself are fascist-adjacent simply for having pointed it out, is complete bullshit.

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with that. There’s no need to create unnecessary hostility between people with compatible goals.

    • soviettaters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s insulting to blue-collar workers to push for social issues that they either disagree with or don’t care about?

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s insulting to presume that blue-collar workers are incapable of agreeing with or caring about the position of treating their fellow man with basic human rights. I have no interest in playing the part of the Brothers Strasser, or of Ernst Rohm. If you think that’s the way to victory, you’re no ally of the oppressed. Just seeking different classes for oppressors.

        • soviettaters@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not a monolith but the majority, or at least a substantial portion, of blue-collar workers are proudly socially conservative.

          • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And the answer to that is to work on ways to make them, as a demographic, less socially conservative; or as individuals, to communicate the importance of such issues. Not to abandon those issues for the sake of pandering to their votes.

          • A7thStone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately you are right. I am a proud union blue collar worker, and I have seen the same thing. The problem I’ve noticed is that they tend to be socially conservative due to years of fear mongering by assholes who want to exploit us. They use that fear to keep is fighting amongst ourselves instead of recognizing the real problems.