Summary

A new WalletHub poll reveals that 74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation, which remains a major concern for most households.

Trump’s plan includes significant tariffs—up to 60% on Chinese goods and 20% on other imports—to protect American jobs and address issues like fentanyl production and border security.

Experts warn these tariffs could increase consumer prices, with middle-income families potentially losing $2,500 annually.

Analysts caution Trump’s plans may face political hurdles in Congress despite his economic-focused campaign promises.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation

    How about not voting the guy in then?

        • Kroxx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It was and they won! Now with Trump in office no more Palestinians will suffer! The humanitarian crisis is over, god-emperor himself said he wants Israel to “finish what they started”. He must mean that war needs to end, what other interpretation could possibly be accurate? I thank Jesus personally every night for helping the man win who wants to jack inflation right back up after it’s finally started taming. Our economy is in the right hands!

          • spacesatan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Weird how people aren’t talking about the major shortcomings of the democratic candidate anymore. I wonder why that might be.

            If Kamala was anti trans rights you’d be sitting here like “why doesnt anyone talk about trans rights anymore, those damned russians at it again”. No, it’s tablestakes that the right is awful. You’re on a left leaning platform, most people here oppose the genocide. Obviously there was going to be vocal pushback on how your candidate sucked on an issue that basic.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        19 hours ago

        As often as people beat that drum, it’s nothing but an excuse for most. They don’t have any actual thoughts or opinions on the economy. Just voting on vibes.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I think it’s that and “the grass is greener” fallacy. “I’m upset with things now so I’ll vote for somebody different because it might be better.”

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            and “the grass is greener” fallacy. “I’m upset with things now so I’ll vote for somebody different because it might be better.”

            Canada is on our way toward falling into that same trap.

            It’s frustrating to see the right wing party so far ahead in the polls when they have nothing to offer except “We’re not that other guy”.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They voted because of “woke” and immigrants. A guy on social media told them those are the real problems we face.

      I can’t believe how little we are acknowledging that social media is currently being used to manipulate voters not just in US but also in Europe. Why people think that what happened in Romania didn’t also happen in US? And is not happening in other European countries?

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      half of the respondents don’t care, because it hurts minorities and immigrants more.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If the voting public were not handcuffed to the two party system by First-past-the-post voting, perhaps they would have chosen someone else.