Summary of the two links above is that when used perfectly, pull out method results in a 4% chance per year for pregnancy, and condoms result in a 2% chance per year for pregnancy. Real world usage (because people usually don’t do things correctly) is 22% per year chance with pull out, and 13% chance with condoms.
So if done correctly, pulling out is 2% more likely than condoms, and if not done correctly it’s 9% more likely than condoms.
It’s not actually too much less reliable than condoms. Both of which usually fail due to improperly being used.
*Edit: I added links as proof further down the comment chain here, since y’all are better at downvoting than researching.
if you don’t realize why this is an absurd statement to make, i suggest you read it out to yourself a couple times
Nope. Didn’t work.
Also, it’s a legitimate fact based on plenty of data by reputable sources and governments.
Perhaps you can link to some of those reputable sources and governments then?
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/withdrawal-pull-out-method/how-effective-is-withdrawal-method-pulling-out
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/condom/how-effective-are-condoms
Summary of the two links above is that when used perfectly, pull out method results in a 4% chance per year for pregnancy, and condoms result in a 2% chance per year for pregnancy. Real world usage (because people usually don’t do things correctly) is 22% per year chance with pull out, and 13% chance with condoms.
So if done correctly, pulling out is 2% more likely than condoms, and if not done correctly it’s 9% more likely than condoms.