• mercphilby@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, today is stolen holiday, and Jesus never existed. So, it’s just another shitty day in Bethlehem because a bunch of rich cunts want to kill people.

        • bricklove@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It’s an internet discussion, if I linked a bunch of scholarly articles, like the creator of the video did, no one would actually read them. It’s a quick introduction for anyone who is curious. Also, this topic has come up on /r/askhistorians several times and has been answered by some of the same scholars referenced in the video.

          • mercphilby@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Everyone knows Jesus was not born on December 25th, and yeah, it was stolen. I can make a YouTube video too. 🙄

            • bricklove@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That doesn’t make it a stolen pagan holiday. Are you a professor of Roman art and Archeology like Steven Hijmans, one of the scholars cited in the video? The medium of presentation doesn’t make the information invalid.

              • expr@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 minutes ago

                It’s far from cut and dry, and there are multiple schools of thought and conflicting interpretations. Steven Hijmans is a revisionist. Traditionally, it’s indeed believed that it was originally a pagan holiday in celebration of Sol Invictus.

                Steven Hijmans presents an alternative interpretation of the various texts that challenges this understanding. He may or may not be correct, but nevertheless, one should not assume that his views reflect a consensus among historians.

              • mercphilby@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 hours ago

                No scholars have ever gotten it wrong, or argued for something in favor of what their beliefs are, despite it being a well documented topic.