OK, maybe you wouldn’t pay three grand for a Project DIGITS PC. But what about a $1,000 Blackwell PC from Acer, Asus, or Lenovo?


Besides, why not use native Linux as the primary operating system on this new chip family? Linux, after all, already runs on the Grace Blackwell Superchip. Windows doesn’t. It’s that simple.

Nowadays, Linux runs well with Nvidia chips. Recent benchmarks show that open-source Linux graphic drivers work with Nvidia GPUs as well as its proprietary drivers.

Even Linus Torvalds thinks Nvidia has gotten its open-source and Linux act together. In August 2023, Torvalds said, “Nvidia got much more involved in the kernel. Nvidia went from being on my list of companies who are not good to my list of companies who are doing really good work.”

    • hallettj
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would be great if there were a way to translate x86 binaries for ARM without emulation. Has Valve found some way to do that? From a bit of searching I see they’ve been testing games on ARM, and that testing involves a version of Proton/Wine that runs on ARM. But it looks to me like they’re testing with ARM binaries for those games?

      I’m as enthusiastic as anyone about more Linux usage, and I agree that Linux support for ARM is a good selling point. But the reason Linux works so well on ARM is that we use all this open-source software that anyone can compile for ARM. I don’t think it’s honest to point to closed-source software that we can’t recompile, and imply that it will work better on Linux because other software runs natively on ARM on Linux.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It would be great if there were a way to translate x86 binaries for ARM without emulation

        That’s called “emulation”.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            It’s a very difficult problem to solve.

            Different architectures are more than just translating op codes. They have different ways to address memory, different types, sizes and number of registers. Compiled binaries use offsets within the code to jump, loop, etc. which all changes when you start changing instructions. It’s much easier to emulate the platform at runtime.

            • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              No doubt. Software emulation of different arches is still magic to me. Being able to run qemu to run just one program on the CLI as an arm bin was so neat