SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agoI doubt that, but ok.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down148
arrow-up1983arrow-down1imageI doubt that, but ok.lemmy.worldSomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squarepuppy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoNo need to watch the whole video. Watch from the 50 second mark. Will only take 20 seconds from there. Even if this was a debate, how is this ad hominem? This being an interview or a debate has nothing to do with it being ad hominem, does it? You can interview someone and say “you are an idiot for giving that answer.” Is this fine because it’s an interview, not a debate?
minus-squareGatoB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoThe context that I supposed was that they were debating and then he said that, atacking the people instead of the argument makes it ad hominem but I was wrong, it was not that context
No need to watch the whole video. Watch from the 50 second mark. Will only take 20 seconds from there.
Even if this was a debate, how is this ad hominem? This being an interview or a debate has nothing to do with it being ad hominem, does it?
You can interview someone and say “you are an idiot for giving that answer.” Is this fine because it’s an interview, not a debate?
The context that I supposed was that they were debating and then he said that, atacking the people instead of the argument makes it ad hominem but I was wrong, it was not that context