Summary

President Joe Biden leaves office with a legacy of leading the U.S. out of the COVID-19 pandemic, advancing infrastructure, semiconductor manufacturing, clean energy, and rallying global support for Ukraine.

However, since live television’s rise more than half a century ago, the skills needed to run for president have diverged from those required to govern.

This led many voters to doubt his capability despite his achievements, forcing him to withdraw from the 2024 race.

Meanwhile, voters have been less critical of Donald Trump’s age, overlooking unpopular policies like tariffs that hurt farmers and manufacturing.

Many Republicans and independent voters accepted Trump’s false claims about the 2020 election being stolen and justified the January 6 Capitol attack, enabling his return to office.

  • XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The Pandemic is still here. All he did was literally what trump wanted to do. Pretend like its gone. No osha guidelines for clean air and co2 level requirements. No upgrades to HVACs and air purifiers in schools, grocery stores, or government buildings.

    Millions of Americans getting long covid every year. Millions of Palestinians displaced and getting killed. Did nothing to get the tech oligarchs to lose power or their monopolies. Didn’t use his new presidential immunity to stop a fascist wannabe dictator from taking power. Didn’t even come out to protect americans first amendment by protecting tiktok and gave that win to Trump who is the reason it got banned in the first place. Didn’t push to legalize marijuana. Didnt do shit for universal healthcare. Fuck Biden.

    • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Didn’t do shit for student loans despite using that as a carrot for both the general and midterms, then claimed he was doing so much when all he was doing was acting in accordance with policies passed by previous administrations.

      Didn’t tell the truth about his cognitive condition until well after the primaries, meaning Americans didn’t have a choice in the primary and Kamala’s candidacy was hamstrung from the start. Therefore we got Trump 2.0. I’d bet money she could have won the general if she wasn’t a nominee by default (I’d’ve voted for someone else in the primary, but I think she could have won it).

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        No chance Kamala would have won on her own. She wasted a $1.5 BILLION war chest because she’s categorically a political loser for POTUS.

        The winning option would have been an ACTUAL primary, where voters picked an ACTUAL candidate they wanted.

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I completely agree that was the only winning option. I also believe the DNC would have thumbed the scale in Kamala’s favor and she probably would have won the primary despite better options. If the DNC cared about winning the general they’d stop interfering with elections. But while that would have royally pissed off a lot of us on the left, a lot of us still would have begrudgingly voted against Trump.

          Had Kamala at least gone through a primary first and then carried any semblance of momentum into the general rather than unexpectedly starting cold, she might have eked out a victory.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree with most of your litany, but…

      Didn’t even come out to protect americans first amendment by protecting tiktok

      Shutting down foreign influence operations and propaganda outlets has nothing to do with the first amendment, any more than prosecuting a slander case does.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Multiple politicians have explicitly come out and said it was because they couldn’t control the images of genocide coming out of Israel, and it was turning people against Israel.

      • XNX@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        They would’ve shutdown Facebook if that’s what they were doing. Its the only platform that has been proven to be used for foreign influence to possibly change the outcome of the US election.

        Or you know, pass data protection legislation and transparent algorithm legislation