Summary

Zaheer Mahmood, 29, was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to murder two people with a meat cleaver outside Charlie Hebdo’s former Paris office in 2020.

Influenced by radical Pakistani preacher Khadim Hussain Rizvi, Mahmood attacked two Premieres Lignes employees, mistaking the office for Charlie Hebdo’s, which had relocated after the 2015 al-Qaeda attack.

Five accomplices were jailed for supporting Mahmood. The victims, who suffered severe injuries, rejected Mahmood’s apology.

Mahmood, an illegal immigrant to France since 2017, was also convicted of terrorist conspiracy.

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well there have been life sentance that have been vacated when new evidence, generally DNA, has come to light proving they were not the culprit. That wouldn’t be possible if they were dead, delayed justice is better than no justice.

    Who knows what sort of technological advances we may get in the next 50 years that could free people imprisoned today? Why would we remove the possibility? It’s cheaper to house an inmate for a lifetime than the process of execution so what’s the practical reason to have I act state sanctioned murder?

    Revenge? Idk. That doesn’t sound like justice to me.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There have also been life sentences where innocent people die before they’re exonerated.

      Also, losing decades of your life for something you didn’t do isn’t any more acceptable because you have the potential of going free if you’re proven innocent.

      All you people are saying is you’re cool with imprisoning potentially innocent people for life, which completely nullifies your argument of avoiding the death penalty because “they may be innocent.”

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There have also been life sentences where innocent people die before they’re exonerated.

        So… we might as well kill anyways?

        At this point, I just have to assume you’re a troll.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          So… we might as well kill anyways?

          No, so your argument about not punishing the innocent doesn’t hold any water.

          If you’re against the death penalty because they might be innocent, then you should also be against any long-term prison sentence because they might be innocent.

          At this point, I just have to assume you’re a troll.

          Yeah, no. I’m just saying things you don’t like. Blocked.

          • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            If you’re against the death penalty because they might be innocent, then you should also be against any long-term prison sentence because they might be innocent.

            Well that is a super crazy leap.

            But okay. Block me. You’re a deeply unserious person saying silly things so I’m gonna call this a win. 😂