Destide@feddit.uk to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoOpen-R1: a fully open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1huggingface.coexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1235arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1227arrow-down1external-linkOpen-R1: a fully open reproduction of DeepSeek-R1huggingface.coDestide@feddit.uk to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareTramort@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoQuintessential does not mean “really essential”, and does not make sense in this context. You can’t really be quintessential “for” something; only quintessential of something.
minus-squareKornblumenratte@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoEthymologically you are right, I wasn’t really aware of the alchemical background of five rounds of destillation when I wrote my comment. Nonetheless, “quintessential for” is not unheard (or rather unread?) of: It will take another generation or two until this usage becomes normalized, so thank you for pointing me to a better style.
Quintessential does not mean “really essential”, and does not make sense in this context.
You can’t really be quintessential “for” something; only quintessential of something.
Ethymologically you are right, I wasn’t really aware of the alchemical background of five rounds of destillation when I wrote my comment.
Nonetheless, “quintessential for” is not unheard (or rather unread?) of:
It will take another generation or two until this usage becomes normalized, so thank you for pointing me to a better style.