• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      That’s nothing compared with intensive irrigation.

      Having a diet proper to your region has a massively bigger impact on water than some cooling.

      Also not every place on earth have fresh water issues. Some places have it some are pretty ok. Not using water in a place where it’s plenty does nothing for people in a place where there is scarcity of fresh water.

      I shall know as my country is pretty dry. Supercomputers, as the one used for our national AI, had had not visible impact on water supply.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        You read all three of those links in four minutes?

        Also, irrigation creates food, which people need to survive, while AI creates nothing that people need to survive, so that’s a terrible comparison.

        • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 天前

          I’m already familiarized on industrial and computer usage of water. As I said, very little impact.

          Not all food is needed to survive. Any vegan would probably give a better argument on this than me. But choice of food it’s important. And choosing one food over another it’s not a matter of survival but a matter of joy, a tertiary necessity.

          Not to sound as a boomer, but if this is such a big worry for you better action may be stop eating avocados in a place where avocados don’t naturally grow.

          As I said, I live in a pretty dry place, where water cuts because of scarcity are common. Our very few super computers have not an impact on it. And supercomputers on china certainly are 100% irrelevant to our water scarcity issue.

          • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 天前

            I don’t know why you keep bringing up luxuries like avocados. I don’t remember the last time I ate an avocado, or a banana, or any exotic fruit for that matter.

            I somehow feel like you won’t listen to LLM criticism from me either, so it’s a disingenuous argument.

            • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 天前

              Because it’s the typical exotic fruit.

              If you really don’t eat anything that it’s not native to your land good for you, you are one in a million.

              What I mean is that the environment argument for being against AI doesn’t really hold. It’s just an excuse to justify the dogma.

              • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 小时前

                Except AI centers are much much more impactful than any single decision a single person can make. Demanding perfection before assessing legitimacy of a complaint is also an excuse to justify dogma.