JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-222 天前Sam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1450arrow-down110
arrow-up1440arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlJOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-222 天前message-square69fedilink
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·22 天前We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek… But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·22 天前I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
minus-squareNaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·22 天前You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model. It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
minus-squareirelephant 🍭@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·22 天前Just the weights, training it is another story.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·21 天前Better than others but not true “open source”
We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek…
But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model.
It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
Just the weights, training it is another story.
Better than others but not true “open source”
True.