The Trump administration canceled $900 million in contracts overseen by the Institute of Education Sciences, which partners with scientists and education companies to compile and make public data about schools each year.

  • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    What was being done with the data was the problem, not the data gathering itself. All this means is that the data won’t exist. The underlying problems still will. Not a single thing you’ve said justifies the action you’re trying to justify.

    • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      ‘Data’ is not neutral! The point of collecting data on teachers and schools was always about control, pushing down pay, cutting benefits and cutting funding. That’s why these monitoring programs started, and continued to exist. A few naive people think that they might have some use in monitoring standards between schools, THEY DON’T. Pearson, Springer, and the other large education companies suck up much of the funding…not to the benefit of classrooms and students.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        ‘Data’ is not neutral! The point of collecting data on teachers and schools was always about control, pushing down pay, cutting benefits and cutting funding

        No, it’s not. It is actually possible to use this data wisely. Source: every other country with better education than the US.

        A few naive people think that they might have some use in monitoring standards between schools, THEY DON’T. Pearson, Springer, and the other large education companies suck up much of the funding…not to the benefit of classrooms and students.

        American skills issue.