• Successful_Try543@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Although, today we feel USB 2.0 is pretty slow, it is literally “Hi-Speed”, USB 3.x would be “SuperSpeed”.

    As thir connectors arent glued or molded to the cable, they can be replaced without damaging the cable by using a soldering iron. For a cheap USB cable, you would need to cut off the connector, remove the isolation and the solder a new connector to it.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s another a different question. Not needing to buy a cable because you’ve already got one is one aspect of sustainability. However, in future, more people will have to buy cables (and chargers) as the will no longer be bundled with new smartphones.

        • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          And no one should be buying slow cables that they’re likely to trash anyway once they figure out their limitations…

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I have no idea why they only fulfill the USB 2.0 specification and not 3.x either, except using them for file transfer being a more rare use case than charging.

            • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have no doubt it’s because of the cost.

              You can get these connectors for less than 1€.
              If you order directly from China I’m sure they’ll be even cheaper.