FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoMuricalemmy.mlimagemessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1529arrow-down115file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageMuricalemmy.mlFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square85fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareLedivin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-22 days agoFood -> exerting force is not even remotely fuel efficient
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·17 hours agoIIRC, even considering those losses, biking is still one of the most efficient forms of land transport. What I found interesting was a study that found that e-bikes were even more efficient than regular ones.
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoIt’s about 22-24% efficient which is the same as a carbon engine. Chemistry and physics, yo, stochiometric ratios. No free lunch. The difference is the mass component of F = M•A
Food -> exerting force is not even remotely fuel efficient
IIRC, even considering those losses, biking is still one of the most efficient forms of land transport. What I found interesting was a study that found that e-bikes were even more efficient than regular ones.
It’s about 22-24% efficient which is the same as a carbon engine.
Chemistry and physics, yo, stochiometric ratios. No free lunch.
The difference is the mass component of F = M•A