• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Part of capitalist ideology is that no matter what the problem, there is a technical fix. Because if there is no technical fix, then there is something wrong with the society, and the defenders of the society do not want to believe this.”

    Honestly, that’s a pretty generous take.

    Part of today’s capitalism is “fuck you, I got mine”.

    I don’t know if capitalism can or cannot be compatible with a living life supporting planet, but I agree that, forced to pick between the two, I’ll choose the living planet.

    Capitalists who love capitalism need to get their asses in gear and prove it can save the planet, if they want to keep capitalism.

    • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      You know, people are inherently selfish. Don’t know how do you want to design effective non-capitalist system around that

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The “selfish human nature” meme was basically invented as a post-hoc justification for the dysfunctional social systems that lead to people behaving that way, it doesn’t actually hold up to scrutiny. Thomas Hobbes for instance was taking the cultural memory of the horrors of war and giving people an easy to swallow explanation, he wasn’t an anthropologist.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The “selfish human nature” meme was basically invented as a post-hoc justification for the dysfunctional social systems

          No, it’s a biological reality rooted all the way in theory of evolution. It’s an inherent part of nature of any living being

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Taking survival of the fittest and using it as evidence of vaguely analogous principles for how human society works has a long history of being wrong. That the way we behave is biased towards survival and reproduction in our native habitat does not imply that the concept of self interest must be at the foundation of how our minds function.

            • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re trying to throw away milions of years of evolution that shaped us, because why exactly? Evolution is a well established scientific theory, what’s your counterargument?

              • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                You may want to take a look at the book “The Dawn of Everything” by David Graeber and David Wengrow. It provides a compelling argument that past human societies were quite egalitarian, cooperative and non-authoritarian, and that the human civilizations of recorded history being the way they are is actually an aberration from the norm.

                Quick video summary of the book by one of the author’s here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SJi0sHrEI4

                • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You should look into “Selfish Gene” by Richard Dawkins. Cooperative strategies are perfectly viable for selfish reasons - don’t mistake cooperative efforts with altruism