• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think a single one of the things you said would help curb gun violence or even school shootings at all.

    Most “school” shootings are drug and gang related in inner cities, with handguns. Rifles are very rarely used, hell, they’re very rarely used in murders in general. Most of our gun homicides are from gangs and drugs, not from random shootings. Ending the cycle of locking up drug users and keeping drugs illegal which is a major source of income for these gangs would start curbing the violence over night. Making sure kids have safety nets to go to and not gangs also would stop the flow of new members to gangs.

    Your list is nice for everything else but how about addressing the glorification of guns and the shooters in the media?

    How do you plan on doing that? You going to ban violence in movies and video games? Or ban rap/rock music? You going to ban the press from reporting on murders?

    Maybe regulate the incitement of violence online and in the political discourse?

    Uhh again how do you plan on doing this? You going to setup a great wall just like china has and enforce it via draconian police?

    How about blocking the radicalization of young men via dangerous conservative rhetoric online, eg. YouTube?

    Apparently you think only white christian male Republicans shoot people…

    Handle cases of bullying that go actively overlooked?

    Sure, I’m game for that, but I’d be covered with more funding so we have smaller classes…like I said above

    Maybe intervene in child abuse and provide help for teenagers with poor mental health who feel ostracized?

    Yea…I said that…safety nets for anyone under 18…

    And the most important of all, block the easy access to these damn guns?

    And how do you plan on doing that? Most guns used in crime are not purchased legally.

    I bet someone better educated on this topic could come up with a better list. But my point is that you’re dying on this tired hill of “it’s not the guns” in this thread but you’re failing to hit the nail on the head on everything else while being condescending towards everyone else:

    I’m being condescending because the mass majority of people who want gun control, have no clue about A) the current laws and B) what our gun violence actually comes from. You clearly have shown you don’t know in this very post.

    Because you’re not even interested in addressing the real issue (and fail to provide a reasonable, insightful solution)

    I mean I did provide solutions that would actually do something, or society is broken, removing a plastic rifle that scares you, isn’t going to solve it.

    so long as nobody’s touching the damn guns.

    Pandoras box was opened, and you’re not going to close it without causing a civil war. Taking rifles that make up a rounding error in the deaths each year is pants on head stupid. Because at the end of the day, you’re not wanting to stop the deaths, you’re wanting to get rid of something that scares you.

    What you’re doing is akin to whataboutism. What the heck does insider trading in Congress have to do with anything?

    I mean it’s not but ok…insider trading is where a lot of Congress gets their money, cut the flow means you cut their power and it means you’re less likely to have greedy fucks who aren’t in it to better society running the nation.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the one part I agree with is the rifles vs handguns debate. In spite of their prominence in mass shootings, I think the thing we need to regulate more is handguns, not rifles. They’re used for concealed carry - for bringing death to another person’s home. Shotguns and rifles are more than adequate for home defense or hunting, and they’re much less practical to steal or transport.

      I think it was Australia that even restricted personal gun purchases to that category of weapon.