• Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Thx @knfrmity for some fellow rocketry knowledge. Just because Elon Musk is a capitalist pig doesn’t mean that his company’s evilness can transcend the laws of physics.

    I do believe these satellite internet constellations in LEO are inevitable. They are a massive force multiplier for the military, and also provide insane soft power via low-cost internet across the globe. China is building their own Qianfan constellation to compete.

    • bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      What is the probability that this nonsense will eventually cause a Kessler syndrome? Or does that only happen in higher orbits with less drag?

      • Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Kessler syndrome is only a big problem for higher orbits where air drag is miniscule. Low-earth orbit refers to a rather large band of space below an altitude of 2,000 km. Objects at the upper end would be much more problematic than at the lower end, since atmospheric density falls off nearly exponentially with altitude.

        SpaceX actually says that StarLink is deployed at 550km, much lower than normal.[1] While this is to decrease latency, it also means their satellites will naturally fall out of the sky in 5 years without periodic boosting of altitude.

        Even if Kessler happened at their altitude, we could all just wait a few years for the trash to fall out of the sky. In fact, the more everything smashes together into tiny pieces in said orbit, the faster the problem would solve itself after since as objects get smaller, their surface area to volume ratio increases, which means drag would affect them more per their mass.


        1. https://spacenews.com/starlink-failures-highlight-space-sustainability-concerns/ ↩︎